Search results

I was speaking more to WotC's near-annual Red Decembers, but yes. It is a common American tradition as well.

That poster's theory is some odd notion that the History book is nothing but a hit piece on all Pre-2024 D&D in order to make the new product appear more palatable. Impressively absurd.

It is an annual tradition...

I'm slightly worried that I'm more interested about the other castings than I am this exists... :)

Ehh. Pinkertons have earned their rep and generally maintained it. But this is off-tangent.

To attempt to state it a little more kindly... Typically, in my experience, this type of embargo means the product is shipped well enough in advance that, in theory, every retailer may have it at the same time so no retailer has a huge advantage in a locality. In exchange for this bit of...

While there is a history of this, I sometimes question if there is an institutional memory of such. It seems like too many decision-making heads have been replaced in those years.

AND NOW.... More of the same!

I would argue that - from a use perspective - slavers to fantasy what Nazis are to recent through near future games. I also think, regarding tolerance of problematic issues, we all have differing levels of tolerance based on the medium for a variety of reasons that I lack the skill to put into...

I spent two years in the 90s trying to get someone to turn in the annual paper on truth in with blank pages.

I'm fond of misappropriated.

There's very little nuance to discuss. Virtually none of the training used for these various generative models has been morally, ethically, and in some jurisdictions, legally sourced.

My point.

This is clearly "These are not the droids you're looking for" where Arcana skill is force mastery. Seems really clear to me and I just walked in on this topic...

Which... time?

Except that's not entirely true. It felt like it in many places, particularly before the Eternal September.

I mean, we're all our own collection of assumptions that overlap with each other except when they don't. I'm sure he felt it was more than obvious; both within his particular artistic framework and in general.

I've trying to figure out how to bring this in. This was the first Elmore piece I was exposed to and it was a few years before I caught his general patterns, whereas I presumed female and never really thought about it again until this thread popped up. Had I seen the cover after say, 5 years of...

No. You cannot conceive of anyone believing the figure is ambiguous. That ain't the same thing by a country mile.

Okay, you got me. Which identified, non-fictional individual is in the painting. I'll wait.