Search results

The Kruthik's aura does not target therefore it will never trigger DC.

I say it depends on what you want to do with your cleric. If all you want to do is hit hard with your weapon powers Pit Fighter furthers that goal but if you want to be more like a leader then you better look out for another PP.

Just choose FWT(1h) and you lose nothing instead you gain, at least when you will build your char around wielding 1h weapons.

By using Brash Strike you grant CA to your target, so the target gains a +2 bonus to hit against all your defenses. You can use two Waraxes(AV) or any other combination of one handed weapons if you have Two-Blade Warrior as a feat. Which becomes less important with higher levels because you...

If you have to worry about Brash Strike don't think about Dual Strike, your worries will only rise. And Comparing Brash Strike and Sure Strike is like comparing swords with oranges when you want to measure destructive power. The real question is why only axe, hammer, and mace wielders got an...

Two feats will help you in your future: One is a paragon (FRPG) feat the other one epic(PHB). The first one applies a -5 penalty to hit your allies in your AEs and the latter one allows you to omit squares in your powers. Sorry I've no names at hand, because I've got no books at hand...

4E is meant to be fun, starting at LVL1. ;)

Emphasis mine. And what do you think that implies?

mischa84 your statement that you can't take a free action in between attacks of a power is wrong. I have an example for you right out of the PHB: Assume a ranger using twin strike: main: flaming weapon; off: any weapon. His first attack hits (main!!), and he uses the power (daily!) of his...

Fleeting Ghost was designed with the intent of removing the penalty to stealth for moving more than 2 squares (CS reply). But since the stealth errata you need superior cover/total concealment to make a stealt check. The power says you can make a stealth check, no condition mentioned. So some...

It is 2[W]+1. 12 + 1d12. I hope that helps.

I think you can change weapons in an attack power that has the melee keyword and offers multiple attacks but does not call out main- and off-hand explicitly:

So if you can multiclass freely, lets say you're a warden and take a Fighter MC feat and then are allowed to take Whip Training, what meaning has that very last sentence I quoted?

Depends on how your other partymembers have built there characters. I have a WIZ in my group (paragon 17-20) who has near maximized AC and good defensive powers. He would be probably a better 2nd line defense than your brutal scoundrel. So unless you tell us something (HP, AC, NADs, powers...

I haven't reread the normal charge requirements but that could work as well: Y = You; E = Empty Squares; M = Monster; A = Ally EEEE EMME EMME AEEY Charge: EEEY EMME EMME AMME Of course you would be subject to an OA. But only useful when you are dazed or something else out of the normal.

By RAW it is allowed. By RAW stupid things are allowed. Now ask yourself if you think that bloodclaw should work with furious smash. The problem is not furious smash but bloodclaw.

But even if you consider OAs and HBO you're probably looking at a glaive wielder with WIS 15+ or maybe a Pit Fighter with WIS 15+ so they both have +2 to hit on OAs right out of the box. And Fighters have Dual Strike too, which could be used on an OA in this case as well which wins hands down...

Why are we talking about prof. issueys here? Take weapon prof. (whip) (the PHB feat) and you're good to go. Your MC slot is free and you can do what you want with it.

Yes you're right. I forgot that you can move to get into flanking position...sometimes you just miss something...and then you're flanked.

You can't flank a creature alone if you use this item: X = Creature to be flanked; Y = You using the item; T = square chosen with item; E = Empty Squares EEE EXE EYE EEE EEE TXT TYT TTT I have replaced all Es with Ts where you could place one. You can see, you can never flank a creature with...