Search results

Paul, He meant other sites, complete fan based sites. But yea in short, if we don't have a full blown 'yes' from now on, we will not be including xxx source material.

Couple of Things I'm going to (attempt) to address a couple of different posts here... 1) Regardless of what people think (i.e. their opinions), no offense, but the only opinion that matters is WotC's. No amount of carping, whining, complaining, commenting, etc, is going to change that...

Charles, I look forward to this a great deal! As a former Marine, I have to ask about my 2 favorite weapons; Will the SAW be listed? Will the Dragnuv sniper rifle be present? If so, which incarnation, the original 7 shot mag/bolt load or the newer 15 mag auto-load (or both preferably)...

Posting for Peter I _HAD_ to share this thread with Peter, so here's his response to it. This is all Tongue in cheek so no funny ideas (well above and beyond what we all have anyways. :p) ----------Start Quote of Peter------------ Another name idea... ::insert icon of a d20::, The Gamers...

Hey guys, sorry to take so long to get back to you... but as Leopold said, we're a bit swamped atm. :) At any rate, the new, new, revamped docs can be gotten here; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pcgen/files/newdocsfinal.zip The walkthrough section has been redone (again and again and again)...

All of those are related to the verboten materials (FR, Apprentice level characters and some specific MM names). nothing to be worried about at all. But I would recommend you grab 3.1.1 that was released Tuesday night at; http://pcgen.sourceforge.net/ You won't get those errors and there's...

CRG's concerns over hard coding should be removed now. Everything is contained within the data files, so that should make life much easier to make a stat block sheet for him. If there are still issues he's having problems with, he can always let us know what he can't do and we can add the...

Just to clear up things a bit... the only materials that we have been asked to pull have been the non SRD Wizards materials. None, I repeat, not one, of the other publishers has asked us to pull anything. That said, a lot of the data files were not included in the 3.0.0 Production release, but...

Weren't you working on some way to import PCGen's Data files? (or was that the character file? I can't remember now) If so, we would set that as (in the Data files) PRESPELLTYPE:2,Necrmoancy[tab]PRESPELL:1,Bestow Curse And viola, could take it unless you had 2 spells of the necromantic...

uh, Chris, where are you getting this from? No one, and I mean no one has ever stated we've gotten a 30 day. Very simply we were asked to stop distributing the Wizards Non-SRD materials. the rest of it is/was/has been entirely up to us. I'm sure that if we don't get things all fixed up in...

Ah, thanks for the suggestions. I actually talked with Bryan McRoberts (Merton Monk) tonight about combing/getting rid of some of the extra tabs, so expect some changes on that front sometime soon (no time frame, obviously OGL/D20 comes 1st)... And for the record, we are using the Players...

Re: hrm... Exactly Very true, and I just posted exactly that thing. [/B] Again, exactly what I just posted Joe, here's where I have issues with you... You claim to not be a lawyer, yet you judge us as doing something shady (i.e. Breaking the spirit of the law)... we have never done any...

What WotC asked us to stop distributing was the non-SRD data files... Which we had done for our production release already, so that was not an issue. and all past data sets of the non-SRD material have (finally!) been deleted from the Source Forge servers, so they can not be gotten to again...

Kzin, Woah nellie!!! Thanks for the support, but we're trying to keep it civil, regardless of past (in this thread) temper flares... Clark has raised valid points, and I hope that we've addressed them, both on board and in private emails... Others have raised concerns as well, and...

Heh, I do tech support for a living... translating from techno-babble to something resembling English is what I have to do to earn a paycheck. :p But I will most definately be the 1st to admit I can blow my gasket when I percieve things in the wrong manner, I am human. Well, as long as you...

Ah, yes, sorry.. we're using the SRD to create the list/data files that we will be sending to Wizards to check everything out... if that data/list set is approved, then it will be the basis for the _format_ of _how_ we do the remaining list files. That clearer?

In short, by becoming D20/OGL compliant, we then have everything in order to include ALL the D20 publishers without issue, such as you (when you are satisfied we're clean)... Even omitting one source of D20 from the users is hurting them in my opinion... The Functionality we've had to pull is...

Correct I mean the Player's handbook, and no, we're not using that to make sure of compliancy, we are using the SRD. (I also use DMG = Dungeon Master Guide and MM for Monster Manual, but again, we're taking (and cleaning up the list files) from the SRD).

Ask and you shall recieve! :D See my last post (not that you can miss it, it's HUGE! :p)

RL Strikes again! *sigh* sorry to take a while to get back to everyone here... Clark, in short, unless it comes from Bryan or Myself, or people we specifically say so, it's not official. At the moment only Bryan and I officially speak for PCGen... of course Bryan has absolute final say in all...