Search results

The poll is unclear for me. I love Atlas for Penumbra and I bought Penumbra pdfs. I discovered Penumbra for me thanks to EnWorld reviews, not above mentioned pdf. I download this pdf and read it, but I didn't buy any Ars Magica books, because I have old ones from '90.

der_kluge - imho You don't understand the world "fun" or "unfun" the same as Mearls. And me. Remove dice? Never! I love the thrill of randomness and sound of dice "the sound of unknown judgment".

This is very good news. No more troubles for The Forge with handling of three shops simultaneously. Thanks, and good luck for OneBookShelf!

I don't need a fighter with "spells". I don't need a fighter so complicated to play as cleric.

I've read introduction and chapter I from PDF, and I decided I'll print and run this adventure. It's easy to criticize a games which I don't like, and it's hard to share the impressions about the game I like, and I like this one. One of my way of judging is to compare: how the designer done it...

Levels 6-7th are good to begin this adventure. IMHO - even better than 5th!

Thanks, but I've bought PDF at Drivethrough already.

Ari Marmell seems to be trustworthy as game designer for me after Tome of Magic. I like the theme of this adventure. So, catsclaw227 thanks for this my-eye-opener thread. I'll read reviews and discussions on Necromancer Games forum, and maybe I'll buy this pdf. That's sad, I don't see it on Amazon.

Simply try EnWorld free stuff.

I know, everyone want to be forever young! But I want thousand times more new 3-3,5e adventures like RHoD than these old flashbacks of youth.

When I'm a player, I have to used such sheets. Because I'm a DM nearly all along, I forget how to use quickly standard sheets. Maybe all basic buffs will be supernatural abilities in 4e? It makes DMing (or even playing my PC) easier.

What is complicated and what is not is a question of who are you. You are better then me in maths, more clever. I played 3d from the beginning and doesn't see these -5/-5/-5 until now. Anyway, it's a mechaniscs beyond mechanics. To play a chess I need to know how to move 8 pawns, 2 knights, 2...

I will explain, why I wrote so: Changing BAB -> It's not so easy as "BAB equal to your CL" because you need to check if Fighter of that level don't has additional attacks, so you need -> take PHB from the shelf -> find the page with Ftr BAB -> check it and add to yours Cleric sheet. Bumping...

And their (designers) job is to find for core rules a point where both complexity and simplycity are in balance. Imho it's a question of using common sense and a lot of asking players on the messageboards. For me this is too complicated: or especially THIS:

Lackhand, it goes exactly as You wrote. I have campaign journal... but in Polish, so I doubt it can be comprehendable for You. By the way, thanks again for good game session :).

If you don't see any bright side of D&D-minatures, now you have first reason to like (or even dislike more) it: they will cut fly spell and large-plus-size monsters, because they don't fit in 5 ft.-squares grill. But seriously: 1. I don't use dragons in my own adventures, because I don't...

Off topic: This car is called Yugo. It was used at car chase in Die Hard 2 or 3 with funny result.

For tens of thousand non-native English speaker D&D players (such as I) it isn't possible to distuinguish what sounds more creepy: "Vitreous" or "Sight". The difference is I must llok for "Vitreous" in the vocabulary, but it inn't a problem. I have to used such new weird monsters at my game...

Thanks for review. I've read this book too and I have to say "WotC is going right side imo". I like maps: crypt, wilderness lair, underground lair and mines. I like ecology stuff, because there are tons of adventure ideas and hooks for me. I like some of new monsters, because of their fun...

I hate comic-style stuff like that: http://www.wizards.com/dnd/images/tob_gallery/99656.jpg