Search results

Agreed on all this, further proving how bad the feature is.

Typos happen guys, even in billion dollar companies.

So Rogue Assassins get prof in a Poisoner's Kit. By spending 50gp, you can make poison that sells for 100gp. Make two doses of poison with that 100 and now you got 200gp. Then you make four doses and get 400gp...you get the idea. So maybe the real reason for this is so the Rogue Assassin can...

I suppose, but it doesn't really feel like it matters that much. It's ok if a magic missile doesn't one shot each kobold 100% of the time; however, most melee attacks with a d6 weapon and a +1 modifier are going to clear this relatively easy. I get that statistically it's significant but that...

Did you post this to Reddit too? I concur with your analysis here. There has been a consistent but strange trend in 5E's history to give the most absolutely worthless passive damage amounts to players. Just because it's passive doesn't mean it should be rendered down to useless book keeping...

Carrion crawler venom in dmg is a con save, so its a likely errata to come.

Sometimes it feels like any obstacle, set back, or loss is perceived as a great injustice against players. Why is it so bad that players might waste a spell slot once with hold or charm person? Its a learning lesson and heightens tension. Why do people focus so much on this small """feels bad"""...

Is comparing 5hp vs 4hp worth doing?

What was the reason for not getting the cool super angel?!

Overall small stuff. Impressive.

Seems about 25 less then other creatures its level. Maybe the siege monster trait is mathematically significant to WotC after all.

Elemental Cataclysm damage is weirdly low compared to other high cr creatures in the book. Any ideas why?

Red. Great idea with absolutely terrible mechanics.

Way of doing things from the dm side, as in, exploration mechanics, big battles, movs and raids, etc. Subclasses don't impact that at all IME. I love optional systems, but imo they close off rulings over rules, not enable it. If you are a more experimental DM it doesn't matter, but if you play...

I have a question: doesn't creating more varient and optional rules eliminate rulings over rules? I feel subclasses actually allows me more dm fiat, as I can make my own way of doing things vs having to use structures provided by the game.

Have you read the new Mm? Monster damage is a lot higher now.

This is my stance. Any class will have people with multiple views on it as well as ways to achieve the fantasy with other options. It seems silly this means we cant have the psion, but we can the ranger and artificer.

I'm kind of sick of you accusing me of purposefully misrepresenting points and attacking you. I've only been friends with you on this forum, I've always been kind to you, and have always respected and enjoyed your posts. You're treating me aggressively and like naughty word and ascribing intention to me...

Hey everyone! I have a new Kickstarter available for SHADOWDARK that just went live. The Wood's Voiceless Hymns is a bestiary of 10 creatures designed each with their own hyper-customizable encounters. As players explore the scaduwood of the Horned God, they'll come across powerful spirits...

That is not misrepresenting, that is proving my point that Baker will gladly bend his world to accomdare new ideas. Dude, you are acting off right now. You are clearly letting your bias bend the conversation.