Search results

You do like metaphors and similies don't you? You take to them like a duck to water.

OP, Please do not change fonts. Your post is black on black for me.

And I guess now is not a good time to visit.

Ive never been over there.

Ditto!

I got no email.

Two systems I do not play so giving this one a pass. If they are doing two systems would it be so hard to do another?

Well, I would call that well funded

Well, the existing games coulld be played by 3.5 people or 4E people or even PF people with no problems I do not really see how makingi t stronger towards pathfinder would make it a better game.

I play 3.5, as well as 4E, and I think _I will still be playing both of them, and not 5E if 5E is released as what it is today.

I would certainly support this idea, but I think it would end up in a lot of dead or nearly dead forums. I think some of the major languages would be a good idea, but which ones?

I know this has happened to a lot of D&D players. A new edition comes (or two or three or ...) and you and your group just do not move on, you stick with an 'older' edition and keep playing what you like. I have always moved on with WOTC and D&D. I started with the red and blue boxes, and have...

First I have heard of it. Thanks

I play 3.5 and 4E depending on the group and game. Whether 5E will be added to those two as games I play remains to be seen, but it is unlikely at the moment.

I cannot see how going back to 3.5 will make next a slam dunk. Or pathfinder, or anything that came before. It needs to be a step forward, not back to an old edition. Any old edition, including PF.

There are always lots of fantasy RPGs out there. Have been since D&D 3.0 came out. I see nothing new here at all.

Ditto. Neither will be taking away what I contribute to the D&D pie.

Nay to gnomes, I say. Bah Humbug

The three WOTC board games work this way kind of If you can get your hands on the tiles from them, it would be easy to set it up.

Ahh, my first 5 point silver sub gift to Gary!!