Search results

I'm not sure if we are looking at the same feat. For a non-Beastmaster Ranger, it looks like a very good feat. If both of your weapons are light, and one of them has the nick property, it looks to me like you can add two attacks to your standard allotment. Ex. level 4 (to keep multi-attack out...

I quoted the relevant part of the feat in my post. I omitted that this attack is on top of the one made using nick. I think you might be thinking of the 2014 feat. Right, so you can attack with your main hand, trade your nick attack for the beast attack, and get a bonus attack via Dual Wielder...

I think I know the answer, but wondering what others think. Beast Master states: "In Combat, the beast acts during your turn. It can move and use its Reaction on its own, but the only action it takes is the Dodge action unless you take a Bonus Action to command it to take an action in its stat...

I have no idea what you...oh, ohhhhh. Oh, that's not right!

There certainly was variation in how powerful casters were based on how easy the DM made it for the party to exit the dungeon and rest up/recharge their spells (making it campaign dependent). It's worthwhile to note that, for AD&D (in particular and in comparison to some in the basic-classic...

What? Some of the best concept albums of all time: AquaPorg Close to the Porg Dark Side of the Porg In a Glass Porg In the Court of the Crimson Porg. Moving Porgs One Porg Fits All Porg of the Century Porg Salad Surgery Porg's Tongue in Aspic The Porg Lies Down on Broadway Thick as a Porg...

I'm a big fan of porg rock. Er, wait...

I certainly don't think that (ex.) 16th level play is too caster-centric because the 16th level caster is casting too many level 2-4 spells. Although that they are casting 1+ levelled spell every round might be an issue (and that is a symptom of not enough encounters per rest). Someone else...

I tend to agree that (like it or lump it) a whole lot of internet discussion over fandom ends up being a competition for the hearts, minds, opinions, or team identity decisions of the rest of the community. Whether that's "controlling" hearts and minds (and whether it is okay) depends probably...

Yes, good point. This addresses the fundamental situation that makes the hot take become highlighted. It's still a balanced party though, just not balanced playing-player's-PCs or however one phrases that. I think 'hot take: ' ends up being synonymous with 'thought experiment:' most of the...

I have a theory. A lot of people have their identities wrapped up in their hobbies and fandoms. If that thing is not treated seriously and as a thing innately worthy of respect, are they? I think this resounds doubly so with 'nerd activities.' A lot of people into these activities spent ages...

A discussion about the 1E/2E 'balanced across time' paradigm with regards to the balanced-party paradigm should probably mention that the 1E/2E thief was a quasi-mandated* role, starts out low-power, and ends up low-power (despite a favorable xp chart). *not as much as a cleric, bashing in doors...

Not currently playing 2014. If a new D&D game pops up, it could be 2014 or 2024, depending on the people who end up being able to play. With regard to the overall question of "how are you reacting to the 2024 update?," my IRL group general attitude is generally "it's there."

I don't know about too mean, but there's definitely community baggage surrounding suggesting that someone else is effectively playing/wants to be playing/would be better off playing a video game. I think the described people (if/when they exist) are looking to play the gameplay loop they came...

I'm mixed on that product -- most of my complaints are about what they didn't do, rather than what they did*. However, I noticed that (a subset of) the fanbase in general had issues with various violations of universe lore/continuity (changelings being vulnerable to vacuum, etc.). Given the...

That was not the intended point of the comment you referenced. Since it is the second time, I was clearly not clear and I will edit my response. It is fairly germane to my other post (regarding OP intent), though, so I'll combo off of it. My interpretation was that Captain Power's situation is...

I'm not talking about which community we are discussing. We can split this up between the fandom and general audience all we want and have multiple different ratings. What I mean is-- by nature of the terms 'over-' and 'under-rated'--aren't we talking about the opinions of others, not ourselves...

Wonderful, but isn't the topic of discussion whether these IPs are under- or over-rated by the community at large others, not ourselves? I'm not sure how this statement pertains to my point. *Edited because people have not been catching my intended meaning.

<quotes cut to cover singular topics> This is why I think thread like this need more first post defining of terms. To me, under/over-rated suggest what those that know a thing think of the thing. If more people should know about the thing, that would be a thread about what would be more...

It's certainly notable as a return to form, rather than in absolute terms. Regarding the magic items -- this is true, but it was decidedly different from 3e/4e, right? They were random, and without concrete purchasing rules. You couldn't plan around them -- pick weapon...