Search results

No, it's used ONCE. Unless something new enters combat in the middle of a fight, it doesn't matter if you rolled a 1 or a 20 on your initiative, you're still acting after your enemy past the first round, and he's always acting after you. Like I said in that last round of the poll, you enter...

Yeek, I can't see how such a worthless feat could beat out power attack. I mean, holy crap? A feat you use once per combat to gain a 20% adventage once?

No, because after the first attack, you go into ping-pong mode. I act, you act, I act, you act. After the first attack, it doesn't matter who went first. In the second and beyond rounds. you're always reacting to your opponents last attack, no matter if he went first or you did.

You guys think Improved Init is USEFUL? A feat you use one time per combat to get a 20% chance of going first, and is only useful for one round?

Improved init, followed by weapon finesse. Power Attack for the win!

I just don't care what people play, as long as it's not disruptive. I don't see what the problem some people have with players playing a different gender PC. I mean, if someone can pretend to be an elf who casts spells at dragons in medieval world, why should it be a problem if it's also a female?

I play all three types. In fact, I'm torn between what to play for my next character, a grey elf wizard, half elf bard, or minotaur monk.

I still don't see them even trying to do a 4th edition before 2010, and I hope it's not even that soon.

I was interested, until I hit: - Feels like playing with an established group of approximately 10 players. Ouch. EDIT: That and the tone of the disclaimer was a turn off.

That's the conclusion I came to. He had a pattern, but without trying to think of what is was going to look like to the players, he deleted some key symbols. He wouldn't notice because he KNEW the answer, and would assume the players could figure it out. But what gets me is that this is going...

That has to be the longest commercial for a product I've seen here yet. :)

I solved the puzzle. The answer: Your DM is an ass. Seriously, there doesn't seem to be any logical answer to this thing. Most likely there's not, the DM just convinced himself that he's smart, and made an "oh so clever" puzzle to prove how smart he is.

Since that's the only sense at all I can pull from this, I'm not to sure if even that is true. But since it's all I have, I'm goign to keep trying to work with it till I get something. Turning the puzzle on it's side and comparing it with the original doesn't help me yet, either. I had kinda...

Ok, there are 68 triangles, 60 arrows, and 62 circles in the puzzle. The puzzle is 15 by 15, which is 225. I can ASSUME that there's supposed to be 75 of each symbol, which would equal 225. So somewhere, I need to add 7 triangles, 15 arrows, and 13 circles. I still don't SEE a pattern though.

Ah, good. I want to slap your DM. If you want to make a puzzle that can be solved in a decent ammount of time, you need some sort of pattern for people to figure out.

I am trying to work on it, but I don't see a clear pattern. Either we and your players are just to daft to see it, or you're puzzle isn't so very clever.

"The Iron Fane" and "Eldritch von Bismark".

If the paladin has to pay for smashing an evil item, does the wizard have to pay for frying magic items with a fireball when the BBEG fails his save?

I say if the party insists on making him pay for it, make the desturction of the weapon a high level encounter, and reward only the paladin with a large sum of experience. :)

I think it's important that a GM understands all but the most rare rules in the book.