Search results

Yeah, I tried to explain why the costs are so low on those, but it's hard to argue with the low prices. I haven't looked for a dumb TV recently, but I get the impression they're mostly extinct now, anyway.

There's one I keep reading as "My Sausage Experience".

Based on a little unverified googling, it's a 45" screen (rear projection, apparently) weighing 359 lbs. It cost $2800 in 1978 (without vcr, if i understand correctly), or nearly $13,000 in 2022 dollars. 🤯 .msust bought a 50" smart tv for under $300 last weekend.

Anyway, since the question is about a trap's general nature, maybe just invent an explicit definition for "general nature". It might encompass things like: - whether the trap's trigger/s is/are mechanical, magical, or hybrid; and - whether the trap is designed to cause damage, and --- (maybe)...

If i understand correctly, el-remmen (OP) is looking at modifying this spell for his houserules, and is looking for suggestions. Adherence to RAW isn't an overarching concern, I don't think.

Someone in another thread posted a pic of the rust monsters in the D&D movie. They were depicted as rat-sized critters up in the rafters eating a lock or something. A neat take on the rust monster, imo. What if such little rust monsters have a complex life-cycle? In "good" times, they're mostly...

Yeah, i was going to suggesta domain of dread, too. They're nice and self-contained and have an obvious bad guy. Van Richten's presents a fairly strightforward rubrik to build on out yourself, too, if that's an option. A more off-kilter suggestion might be Neverland. It's an island sandbox...

Of course I watched it; I was 10. It wasn't a choice. It was a duty, in service to the gods of Saturday morning cartoons.

Maybe it's one of those clever nested acronyms* where "mac" is short for "mac and cheese". * Interestingly, the word for a nested acronym is "macronym", but how that relates to macaroni and cheese is still undetermined.

No, I don't care at all where a DM sources their monsters. Brand new, surprising monsters are great; as are completely reskinned MM monsters. The one caveat, imo, is just be consistent within the campaign.

<insert very strong opinion about darkvision here>

The 2e Monstrous Manual depiction of the invisible stalker is especially memorable, and seems pretty accurate:

Mayor: "We are eternally grateful to you for eliminating our giant cellar rats! As reward, please accept all we can offer: the finest pig in the village!" Party: " . . . " Bard: "I seduce th--" Party: "Shut up, bard!"

That's a really strange thing to see at a D&D table. Personally, I'd feel criminally remiss as GM (or player) if I wasn't speaking as (or listening to) all the weird non-humanoid things that could possibly hand out rumors, dreams, hints, puzzles, orders, deals, and so forth. "If it's got lips...

Obviously, But I voted mythic and classical, since regular people cavorting with gods and all that seems a good time for true superheroes to emerge, and to do so in spectacularly weird ways.

Just great. Now I've got Timberlake and Samberg singing "Click on a Box" stuck in my head.

Isn't Goodman Games' OAR#9 Caverns of Thracia still slated for release in 2025? If so, the 5e version of that is probably the 5e thing I'm most looking forward to this year.

That revenant appears to be the old "way too many belt-buckles" fad, returned to unlife.