Search results

I'm very intrigued (though skeptical).

It's not something to be proud of. ;)

Increased fun, of course! As with others here, for us this was the most-used article out of any magazine, ever.

And, to be fair, you only quoted from Irda Ranger... ...which is a wholly reasonable statement. One that seems to be close to how I feel. D&D worlds "should rightly be thought of as simulations"? Who knows? I didn't see Irda Ranger say that. But, from what he's posted, it seems like a "working...

I have a hard time believing that you can't figure out that everyone draws their personal line in the sand at a different place. So, my personal answer to the above is, of course, "it's 'working out' perfectly in the editions/systems I choose to play, thanks".

I'll be picking it up used.

Any word on this problem? *sob*

But he was just talking about the existence of a pattern, and used the commonly-known "Star Trek pattern" as an example. That's it. You don't. The specific pattern the OP pointed out was pretty clear. Anything beyond the 3rd movie doesn't have a pattern, yet. I think the continuity of a given...

"Correct" him? No, his theory is still reasonable... and he didn't even mention the old Batman movies! (Though there could be some arguement that #2 was only mediocre.) Why is Star Trek in your list...? (Actually, your list isn't even relevant to the OP.)

I don't know what this means...

Okay, now I'm absolutely sure there are two writing groups! ;) Writers #1) Season 2 guys. Come with with crap like "Riley", seem to not care about Terminators all that much, and thought that the whole corporation with a talky-talky T-1001 is a good idea. Writers #2) Season 1 guys, with a...

Hmmm... looks like they should have called this seaon "Morons", instead of Villains. The Claire/Puppetmaster bit of nonsense was some of the stupidest stuff I've seen. (Oh, who am I kidding. Claire sucks period this season.) She had the guy's file, for chrissakes - and she just stands there...

"If I had enough free time"? Well, sure, of course I'd play. Of course, since that is wholly, completely, and wildly unrealistic (thus making it meaningless), I can't really answer the poll. In the end, everything has some sort of opportunity cost. In this case, it would be 1e vs. something...

No surprise here. Some of the exact reasons why I'm not all that interested in 4e (and certainly among my players' reasons). I'm nothing if not consistent.

Non-existent.

That was a flat-out awesome episode. Nice to see it was B&W all the way through. They did everything right with that episode. While some say that once a series gets into too many seasons, it gets "stale" - and that might generally be true. However, one good thing about somewhat-long-running...

Sure. They couldn't even be remotely as bad/unwatchable as X-Men 3, could they? I don't know enough (read: virtually anything) about Spiderman to answer.

Of course, for some, all one needs to know is what works for "just a small group of people".

While I don't necessarily disagree with your assertions, the above is a highly specious argument and a load of bunk. I see absolutely zero evidence that the above was even remotely true. Quite the contrary, actually. (But I generally agree with the rest. The franchise is dead, and something...

- Print. - Price isn't an issue at all (though I would happily pay more for print) - Back to the "quality" during Paizo's tenure (e.g. an actual SoW outline, along with detailed support articles in Dragon; and simply: "better adventures") - If I'm stuck with electronic, then the maps need to...