Yes, always, but only as a personality guideline, except on extreme cases like high-level clerics and Outsiders.
So, my votes are
-yes always
-only as personality guideline
-other
Is the idea behind the Kingsman franchise something akin to Extraordinary Gentlemen? I’ve kinda managed to dodge the movies completely, and just thought it’s something like slightly serious Austin Powers or something…
Top 5 I think I can just about manage but I can’t rank them individually against each other. So, a chronological order of the Top 5
Unser Liebe Fraue - Trad. C.16th Cent.
Walkürenritt - Richard Wagner 1851
I Dovregubbens Hall - Edvard Grieg 1875
Finlandia - Jean Sibelius 1899
Mein Kleiner...
You know what, I don’t think I’ve heard of the Wings either. To me McCartney is a Beatle and a solo artist.
Then again, I’m really bad at modern popular music alltogether. If it’s post 1920’s I have a hard time recognising it.
Half my workmates are 20+ years older than me, and the other half were born after the Phantom Menace 😂
It’s funny to feel like a highschooler and a grizzled veteran at the same time.
So, the variant rule on page 175, using skills with different abilities. Am I the only DM who actually uses this? Now a rogue who is proficient in athletics, I’d totally let them climb with proficiency and dex.
I actually did this with those poker gambling machines. The very first time I put money into one, I got it back with something like x25 winnings. I have not played a gambling machine since then and never will. I quit while still ahead.