Search results

What does "ooc" mean? Out of Character? Out of Combat? Out of Cheese? Out of control?

No, I would make it -1 to their 2 highest stats, or -2 to their highest stat, to get that feat.

How does one recover from its affect once it is in place, other than if the Otyugh chooses not to continue the effect. They only way to end the stunned effect is to make a STR save, which automatically fails if you are stunned?

Actually, the otyugh cannot opt to Tentacle Slam instead of bite. His muliattack gives him 3 attacks: He cannot make 3 attacks with the tentacles.

In the corrected book, the Tentacle Slam has not been changed. The slam still stuns the victim, which lasts until the end of otyugh's next turn, and it still requires a strength save.

Magic Weapon Her is another one. On page 140, under Weapons (top of page, column 2) they added the following paragraph:

Another change I have found, also involving magic, is on page 129, under Crafting a Magic Item. In the first sentence under the Crafting Magic Items table (change marked by my bold):

Ok. Yes, they rewrote the section on scrolls on page 139.

They did add to the entry for Spell Scroll. (Page 200) Added to the end of the first paragraph (my bold): The single-sentence paragraph beginning with "Once the spell is cast..." is removed, having been moved into the above quote.

Anyone have a clue what might need errata in the DMG? I have the "This printing includes corrections..." printing as well as first printing, but not sure where to check for what has changed.

What a slippery slope. Introduce a wardrobe, next you'll have to include rules for the clothing that could fit into that wardrobe. And could you put anything besides hats on the top shelf, anything besides footware on the floor of the wardrobe. If the boots are still muddy, what would be the...

Look at the Abjurer. At 10th level he gains the ability to add his proficiency bonus to specifically Dispel Magic and Counterspell. Not until. And other wizards are not as good at abjuration spells as the Abjurer. So why should other wizards be able to add their proficiency bonus?

I wouldn't allow the INT modifier twice, but possible the proficiency bonus if you are proficient in Arcana. EDIT: Good catch Saelorn. Therefore, no all around.

A blank spellbook cost 50 gp. It costs a wizard 2 hours and 50 gp/spell level to copy a new spell into his spellbook. So that is a starting place. But, RAW, a wizard must copy a newly learned spell into his own spellbook as part of the learning process. So, again RAW, he has to pay time and...

16. Entire pantheons want to fight you so they can all go up a level.

How about runes carved into a staff?

Thank you very much. My group did find one small error. "chaotic evil (alignment)" is listed twice. Now THAT's chaotic!

Sounds like a time for the Cleric to use Thaumaturgy to amplify his voice and shout something like "Surrender and live or we will cut you all down as you flee!"

One should also ask, why would a Fighter or Paladin be proficient with most simple weapons, just because the martial weapons are statistically superior.

If the rogue should be disarmed (taken prisoner) I think he would like to be able to use a few other good weapons. It also can make for an interesting choice: use a sneak-attack weapon, or use a really nice magic weapon.