Search results

I think for thunder damage it could still be a charged sand, with the difference that the crackling of electricity between dust grains may create a deafening sound. For force and psychic a more creative license may be needed... Maybe for psychic it could be the Sands of Time (nod to Prince of...

I'd love to support but the physical edition is not for me. Would I be able to only get the pdfs of the adventures?

What's not clear to me is why one would deal damage over time instead of all at once at the beginning, and still manage to spend more MP to do so. I thought that dealing damage over time would result in a net saving of MP wrt dealing all damage at the beginning, and this saving would work in...

Hey @Morrus could you please provide any clarifications about this?

No, it's about this: A creature has natural SOAK Y against damage type Z. Someone casts Hex Vulnerabilty to damage type Z against the creatyre. By the rules about combining vulnerability and SOAK, this would mean that the creature would lose all soak and be vulnerable (which seems very strong)...

I'd say the answer is yes, and is implied by the following: "When you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the bonus invocations you know and replace it with another bonus invocation from this list that you could learn at that level" I'd say no: "You can use an action to unleash...

My point is: what if you have both SOAK and vulnerability to the same damage source? The rulebook would specifically say that natural SOAK is negated by a vulnerability effect

While these formulas are correct and may be applied when time is an issue (i.e. rolling these exploding dice all the time) or when the VTT platform does not support exploding dice, they only compute the average result. Single realizations of exploding 6d6 may however result in way more than an...

Ok but then in this case how would the combination SOAK + vulnerability work?

Four Flameskulls open with fireball

What's very interesting to me is that I see a lot of cross contamination between LU and WOIN. Would love to eventually see a whole adventure path, maybe set in ellissar, converted to WOIN. There was also a similar "porting" for Zeitgeist, but only the first adventure came out unfortunately.

I was rereading the rules and found an interesting passage in the equipment section regarding resistances and vulnerabilities: Given that there is a vulnerability effect in the Hex magic skill, it seems that one single application of it would completely remove a monster's SOAK. This combined...

I think in this case the descriptions are very clear: Unlikely Wield: When you engage in two weapon fighting, you can use the third weapon to make an additional weapon attack. Two Weapon Fighting: you can use your bonus action to attack with a different dual-wielding melee weapon that you are...

Cool! Are all adventures new? I think I have all numbers of EONS but I don't seem to find them.

I'd really love to see some O.L.D. sessions. @Morrus I'm thinking the launch of the next WOIN starter set would be the perfect occasion to do some live streams of an O.L.D campaign, just as the other live streams shown at enlive. WOIN is really a fantastic system for me, and I thin it would...

Seems cool! Some of the ship's attribute are the same as those used in N.E.W. Will there be a backport to WOIN or some cross-contamination between the two?

I cannot give you a general guideline, but in a sticky post about encounter building guidelines @Morrus specifies that it is expected that both parts fully employ tactics, including LUCK dice. Maybe you can decide that goons cannot spend the LUCK dice if the encounter should be an easy one, or...

It's not me it's clearly written in A5E rules... The point is, that was barely an encounter, due to the surprise round and the 3 crits in a row from the PCs side. If the dragon even got one entire turn, the group would have probably been toast

I was referring to "Epic". That's what I was referring to as a tag. The table you linked refers to "Epic" monsters, which are unofficial both in o5e and LU. On this we agree, but we disagree on the final result. I checked it. It seems a very convoluted way to get a TPK (as the link itself...

That's a different topic altogether. FWIW, it's leaps and bounds better than what WotC published, both in terms of guidelines and as monsters. It seems WotC may backtrack a bit on their own approach with the next edition of D&D, where something they call "iconic" is strictly stronger than other...