Search results

This is not an attempt to threadjack but... Is there any reason why Coordinated Explosion wouldn't work for a Monk?

Dropping prone is a minor action, not a free action, so no.

Exactly! But a character could drop it before the next creature in the initiative order acted on their turn... which is functionally identical. Simple, no!? :p

It's a free action, so it doesn't have to be your turn to use it. That's the argument anyway, as near as I can follow it. Charging ends you turn, but you can take your free action on the next creatures in the initiative order's turn, before they act. :-S

On Athas, Warforged are made of stone and wood.

So for at-wills... You can choose: to use both the move and attack option of full discipline power X, provided you spend that appropriate action for each. to use a standard move action and the attack option of full discipline power X, provided you spend that appropriate action for each. to use...

http://www.enworld.org/forum/d-d-4th-edition-rules/272935-can-i-sustain-power-without-line-sight-its-effect.html

My opponents should have to suffer my Combat Superiority before learning that it should be avoided. Now, granted, we've been fighting mostly intelligent foes, but it is still no fun. It reminds me of 3e Favored Enemies.... which you never ever encountered.

My chain fighter has the Blade Opportunist feat, and an Opportunistic Spiked Chain, so naturally, my DM has never had a createure provoke an OA. Almost level 4. Sometimes I don't think he gets it.

There are some WotC people on these forums, but these are not their forums. Perhaps you might consider starting a similar thread there? It certainly can't hurt.

Monk's don't need a feat to use staff's as implements as I read it.

Being flanked while prone doesn't grant combat advantage twice, does it? A double run isn't running faster, it's running for longer.

I can't actually find any rules to interpret (or misinterpret). For now, the DM has to adjudicate on the cheesy/not-cheesy scale, I guess.

It's the same penalty... so it doesn't stack.

It's a free action... you could flurry before the push, no!? Don't have my books handy. This is the second time the timing of free actions has come up today (that I noticed). A few searches has turned up nothing definitive... just the same contrary opinions. Hmmm.

I'm sure there was a whole thread arguing both sides of this Free Action timing regarding Barbarians and charges, and all that. The only rule I can find is that the number of free actions allowed is up to the DM. I said yes, 'cause it's not really abusive, in my opinion, to allow it between...

I agree, though, I wouldn't play it that way myself. I wouldn't allow a phasing creature to attack from within blocking terrain, or have their aura work through it. My problem was that it didn't sound like a lot of fun... though as they admitted, they could have readied actions and dealt...

True enough. Thanks for pointing that out.

That wording says 2 to me.

here.