Search results

Not without a feat, or if a specific power that says so, no.

How about this? Choose Target 1, Choose Target 2 Attack 1: Roll d20, calc. damage Attack 2: Roll d20, calc. damage

No, it does not. What Ranger stuff in particular did you want? You can do a Ranger that doesn't need Two-Weapons if you pick carefully (Hit and Run works nicely for a Barbarian... ... although I've not made one all the way to 30... it depends on how much Multi-Classing you want. There is the...

and Eladrin Sword Wizardry (AP)... but that's more specific. What weapons are available? Not all?

Indeed! :lol: And congratulations!

Hmmm... Scribd is new to me. Just did a search on D&D... and lots of 3.5 stuff came up. How annoying.

I'd like software that would allow a camera to optically reads the dice, and then adds the bonuses. You still roll the dice, but you can't cheat it's faster as long as you have all your powers reprogrammed. Mostly kidding.

True enough. I had a DM once that wouldn't be cooperative when I rolled up my 3e Ranger. I asked simply, since the campaign was as yet undescribed, what would be an appropriate favoured enemy. Wouldn't say. Can't remember what I picked... don't recall ever getting the bonus either.

I'd like to see something classless. Hard to balance I suspect.

I've given up on dice sniffing personally. In any case, the Assassin isn't there yet. The next CB update is supposed to be Sept. 1.

Or that. :p

the at-wills are so numerous 'cause psions don't get normal encounter powers. Their at-wills can be augmented with power points for greater effect. I don't recall off the top of my head how many they get. I take it you don't have D&DI subscription? The Compendium seems to be working. The...

If you go by what they have in the glossary on D&DI, which is from the MM2, the vulnerable damage is not halved.... it's added outside the brackets, as it were.

What did you have in mind for standardized damage? Just like minions? The tiny evil simulationist in me wants to do damage based on how much they missed their defense roll by... but that's more work still... I'm not opposed in general to standardized damage, but I'd like some range. Low...

Cyan knows how to re-open the portal, or You've made a powerful enemy very angry, and despite not being able to get to you now, he has powerful friends, and when you least expect it...

I actually like that a player can figure it out. A PC is trained in combat, and should have some ability to judge the threat level of an opponent. I don't want to make it skill challenge mind you, but I have toyed with the idea of having insight checks with bonuses based on relevant...

Only in that it should be a lot harder to hit someone with a thrown sword. ;) Personally... if they PCs start throwing swords around, I'd have the NPCs pick 'em up and attack them with 'em. -1 to hit and +1 to damage per pound sound fair? :hmm:

Not that I could see on a quick read through the class and path. Weird, though an easy errata... ... or something. Makes you wonder what got changed along the way that the editors could miss that.

I was thinking that it wouldn't be much different... there rolling a 1 or me rolling a 20... and would in fact, make it easier to remember to use their interrupts... It would likely take longer, true. I guess it depends on how you do these. I thought this would make it easier to describe...

I wouldn't do it to save time, so much as keep players involved, and maybe encourage more creative energy at the table. I can still fudge the damage if need be. I wouldn't let them roll that... that's just adding insult to injury.