Search results

Zinovia is correct. Next time you have a PH in hand, check out page 276.

At the moment, WotC isn't allowing me to log in... so...

I didn't say there was an issue, I said I wasn't thrilled with it. I know that the weapon base type restrictions are mostly fluff, but Holy Avenger fists don't work for me, personally. I'm not opposed to an unarmed fighting feat, or what have you, I just think that the feat proposed is...

Agreed.

I'm not so thrilled with the last part, in particular when it comes to the base weapon type restrictions.

More Necromancy! One is a Charge that uses Fey Step, and one is Fey Step (with no +1). They're not the same thing. At least, that's how I'd solve the problem if I was your DM. That said, how many times can you hit AC in row with a basic melee attack?

You're evil. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. I'd wait to see what they come up with for Dark Sun before I started making house rules, but to each their own. :p

I question your use of the word certainly. :p See number 19.

That would depend a great deal on the DM. ;)

Probing Strike (Rogue) doesn't require Rogue weapons, and has a buff (+1 to hit) effect even if you miss. Commander's Strike (Warlord) is useful to any class of Half-Elf, as it uses the ally's roll, though it requires you to be base to base with the opponent. Dragon's Tail (Monk) is Dex vs...

Happens to the best of us. I played for a long time thinking that it was 3 failed saves before an extended rest and you died.

How about a feat that allows you to stand as a minor (or free) action, but provokes OAs?

Still doesn't mean I have to like it. :p

You are correct, and your DM is not. A Beast Master Ranger, on their turn, can use a move action to move themselves, their beast, or both.

Is there an Artificer Hybrid class update somewhere that I missed?

Isn't that a Rogue utility power now? Hop Up Not that it's a bad idea, but I'm not sure what the specifics of their design policies are.

Dark Sun Wiki may, or may not, fill in some themes if not actual details.

Point out the retraining rules on page 28 perhaps? Maybe the DM can allow the player to retrain all the way back through the 8 levels?

Yes. In the context of fighter marking, it's an attack and the target can be marked, if you rolled to hit.

That quote, according to D&DI, is from the MM2.