Search results

Mine is from the Onion.

Turanil also said, "Setting aside the problem of recovering hit-points and resurrecting the dead..."

You're jumping to an unsupported conclusion, Henry. The OP asked whether people would play in a world without clerics, not if they would play in a world without healing spells. I, for one, run a game without clerics, but I've opened the entire clerical spell selection to arcane casters.

Monodrones?

QFT.

In my campaign, I removed the divine spellcasting classes and assigned their spells to the arcane spellcasters. Belonging to the priesthood has nothing to do with your character class.

First thing, you need to decide what it is you want out of your homebrew. So, what do you want out of your homebrew? :D

Here's the combat equivalent of "I bluff them": Player: "I hit for 12 damage." DM: "Huh? Which ogre are you attacking? And are you using your bow or your sword?" Player: "Stop asking me questions! I hit for 12 damage!" Social die rolls need at least as much context. :lol:

This is a fair point if the PCs would already have that information. If they don't, however, then it adds a neat exploratory element to encounters with the Sun Elves as the players try and figure out how the rank system works. :D Staff officers could be Coronals , though the name works...

GLAIVE-GUISARME.

My new fighter totes a heavy flail. Of course, we do have some house rules involving knockdown and variable armor benefits versus different weapon types that make it a lot more useful than in vanilla 3.x rules, so I'm not sure that counts. :D

Villages & Villagers.

My character would keep a journal if he could afford paper and ink. :lol:

You have options other than "all in one big group" and "spread out 30 feet apart". Try a range of other formations: lines, columns, small squads, encirclements, pincer movements, etc.

I agree that there shouldn't be mechanical benefits for quarter-race blood. But if you disregard this recommendation and provide such benefits, then you must have a corresponding penalty to balance it out. Otherwise, why would anyone ever play a human again?

That's what "tactical voting" gets you.

That looks pretty awesome. It would be tempting to use as a mundane tarot-like fortune telling deck in a D&D game.

Weapon technologies affect individual and small-unit combat in very different ways than they affect combat on the army scale. You can't use arrow storms, shield walls or musket volley fire in single combat.

Isn't there a section on cursed items in the DMG?

Die Freeport Die. :mad: