Search results

1) You can use more than one encounter power per encounter and more than one daily power per day. 2) You can't attack with two weapons unless you have a power that lets you do so. Example: Twin Strike

No offense, but how is your house rule less complicated than "unless you have resistance or immunity to both, you take full damage"?

Sorry, I spend a lot of time on the boards some people have a tendency to make up terms that don't exist and wonder why things don't work the way they think they do. Yes, you will provoke. Each square of movement is counted separately. If it didn't work that way the power below would be next...

There is no "threat box". Your DM can't just make up a term and expect it to apply to the game. OA's work exactly like it is stated. When you leave a square adjacent the enemy gets to make an OA. It's a yes or no type of thing. Did you leave an adjacent square? Yes, then you provoked an OA. Now...

Almost correct, but not quite. Penalties always stack unless they come from the same POWER. Considering all the different ways to add penalties to you attacks they should use the new "same named game element" rule, but they haven't changed the penalty rules to use that yet.

Even so, the Wall of Fire doesn't make attacks. It does automatic damage. Since there is no attack roll involved the Wall of Ice takes no damage.

Ok, people you are overlooking some thing very important. Wall Of Fire and Wall of Ice are both conjurations. Conjurations can not be attacked or damaged in any way unless the power in question says so or unless a power specifically targets conjurations. Wall of Fire is not a creature it is a...

A B C Q R F 7... Wait that can't be right. Damn you alphabet. :rant: :p

I almost voted perfect, but sometimes the shear number of conditions that are being thrown around in an encounter can be a little hard to keep track of.

You apply everything in order from where it is written top to bottom. This is stated in the PHB2 under "How to read a power".

There is a post about this in the WotC errata forum from a year ago, but it has gotten no attention. I just bumped it so that maybe the devs will see it and address the issue. WotC_GregB has been posting in those forums that certain rules are being reviewed or if they are working as intended...

This has already been acknowledge by WotC as a mistake and is not an actual rule. There are a few mistakes in that book. For instance it suggests that you should stack untyped bonuses from the same named game element. see below.

Actually, I believe that it is suggested that DM's do that in the DMG.

The Rogue has one. It's even in the PHB1. Piercing Strike.

I am not a geek. I am a nerd, thank you very much.

Superior Staffs?

If you didn't roll high enough to crit then how is it suppose to trigger crit effects? Anything that happens on a crit happens only if you crit. If you roll a 20, but don't have enough bonuses to actually hit the enemy then you did not crit.

It's a legacy rule. You absolutely can do 0 damage with an attack in 4e. If a Wizard with an 8 strength throws a punch, hits and rolls a 1 for damage he will do 0 damage because of the -1 strength modifier.

The level 24 works on Domination as well as Daze and Stun.

Circlet of Arkhosia lvl 14/24(Player's Handbook Races: Dragonborn) (Property), Circlet of Clear Thought lvl 18(Dragon Magazine 365): If caused by charm(Daily power).