Search results

Considering that were were arguing about whether or not casters were less effective because they can't use IAoP or BoA and not about DPR, I'd say static bonuses are relevant to the post.

Well, the upside to the errata Double Weapons is now when they are enchanted both sides benefit from the magic properties. Saves some gold for other magic items especially when building higher level PC's. I like the new version better myself. They used to be a non-choice for Tempest Fighters...

Warlords excel at making the rest of the party awesome by handing out extra attacks, hit and damage bonuses out the wazoo.

I know this is not directed at me, but no where in the Opportunity Actions block is there any mention of Free Actions or No Actions. You are making the assumption that Free Action and No Action have to be a subset of Opportunity Action or Immediate Action. In no way is this true or even implied...

No, that's not right at all. There are four types of TRIGGERED actions. Opportunity actions (One of which is an Opportunity Attack other opportunity actions are specific powers) Immediate actions (which can be interrupts or reactions, and which are limited to once per round) Free Action No...

Yes, you can interrupt an interrupt. Since CC is interrupting the foes attack your attack will resolve first. If you hit the foe he will have a -4 to the attack he is currently making. No. The extra -2 two ends at the start of your next turn. Unless one of your allies is granting you an action...

It's a free action not an opportunity action. Completely different type of action. That doesn't say that even a little. Nowhere in that sentence you quoted does it say that a trigger can only happen once per opponents turn.

My personal opinion is to treat all triggered Free Actions like Immediate Reactions unless the power or feat specifies otherwise..

That is true of every free action power or feat that acts like an immediate action. As far as I know there are no rules on how to decide whether you should treat it as an interrupt or reaction. It's really annoying.

Free action

Dragon 381: Class Acts: The Duelist Rogue.

It is a Dragonborn arcane class feat from AP. It gives +1, +2(15th lvl), +3(25th lvl)feat bonus to attack rolls to any arcane power that deals the same type of damage as you breath weapon.

Could also be used to get an enemy to attack a Darklock who has a bunch of points in his Dark Spiral Aura.

It's 5.

I'm going to use a couple of 12 level characters I have made as examples and will only be comparing At-Wills. So there we have 2 out of 3 Arcane spell casters that have a higher static bonus to damage then a melee striker without the use of a Staff of Ruin.

You are correct, but it is only limiting when compared to the Wizard of previous editions. Your casting limit is the exact same as every other class. If you were allowed to cast more than one Daily spell per Daily spell level you would have an advantage WELL above any other class. Especially...

Each level of daily power can be cats once. The Wizard gets to choose each day which daily spell he is able to cast that day, but he will only be able to cast one 1st level daily spell and one 5th level daily spell just like any other class. The Wizard just gets more flexibility then any other...

Like Ryujin said the attack will resolve completely and you will be hit if he rolls high enough. Even if the power was an interrupt, the attack would only miss if you moved out of the attackers reach.

That sounds like more effort than swinging a sword and swinging a sword is a standard action.

When I was playing my Sorcerer the Avenger in our party would keep telling that if I had to I could hit him with one of my spells. Then I showed him that my minimum damage was more then his healing surge value. He didn't bring it up so much after that.