Search results

I would also like to extend my thanks. I would have never been able to find that link on my own. That is a nice PP. It really increases the healing abilities of the Shaman. If you are a Protector Shaman it looks like an ally adjacent to your SC will gain 2*CON+WIS when you heal them with a...

They also added more damage to the Goliath feat. So even if they were to limit the Dwarven feat to martial weapons they would probably increase the damage for that feat as well.

I'm going to have to say it was completely intentional. Especially since AV was already written when the PHB was released. Just because YOU didn't know about superior axes and hammers when 4e came out doesn't mean the dev's didn't. As for you the epic retraining silliness. +1 to damage isn't...

I'm not talking about getting rid of it all together. I just want the focus to be more on the adventures and less on food and water rations. I'm sure there has to be a way to give you the survival of the fittest feel without it having to be constantly in your face.

I can agree with that. There were plenty of times my fighter could have killed the monster 3 times with the amount of damage he did. Especially with the feats that double your crit chances. 3.5 fixed that, somewhat, by not allowing the Keen property stack with what ever the equivalent feat was...

I love Darksun. I don't even really know why, but I do. The only thing about 2e Darksun that I didn't like were the food and water rules. I get why the rules were there, but I always felt like they got in the way. Of course, I feel the same way about the encumbrance rules so that may have...

I'm a player and I haven't read any of the published adventures and haven't played through them. I say that to show that my question is based on hearsay and not on actual experience. I've always heard that the published adventures are very light in the amount of magic items that are given out...

This is going to take some getting used to.

You could always just give your vampires Mist Form as an interrupt or a free action when reduced to 0. This way there would still be a chance to out right destroy the Vampire and a chance for the Vampire to survive. If you really want the Vampire to return to the coffin you could do this.

Most of the optimization board is theoretical best case scenario and most likely would never work in a real encounter. At least not to the extent that they claim.

If you right click on the monter list you can copy it in rich text format.

Page 27 and 29 of the PHB.

Indentation is what is important here. Dragon Magic is indented under the hit so that means that it only comes into effect if you hit.

Crap, I miss read what he was asking. Poopies.

It works exactly like it says. The next enemy that hits you takes fire damage equal to your str mod. There is no requirement that says you had to hit them with the spell first.

You only have to guess if the bad guys are being stealthy. Otherwise, you know exactly where they are.

As far as staff Wizards I think it's more of an issue of a problem with the staff implement than weapon focus. As far as any other weapon/implements I think that they are suppose to be more damage oriented. Edit: A good way to fix the staff issue would be to get rid of the staff weapon group...

Weapon Focus was intentional. I do not believe it would be written differently.

Battlerage Vigor, but I think what he really means is the Invigorating keyword.

Yep, that my only requirement. Hell, I'll probably buy it even if it's not good. I'm a DnD whore.