Search results

Inst that what the power does? The target shifts, and then you attack anyone in range.

Wait, why cant you use it on PCs with an NPC? PCs arent subject to goads?

But its not a pull. The target shifts. On a grid I cant see a way where a large red dragon can shift into being flanked, without having already stopped because he is already adjacent. EDIT: Yes I can, however its a lot simpler if its a pull/slide which there are pleantly of powers that do...

I cant think of a situation where that is possible. Can you please demonstrate.

The fluff makes it look like a goad to me, but really its whatever you want.

Do you hold your hand in your hand, or you foot in your hand, and then attack with it? No.

Page 271.

You actually do need one piece of ammunition or light thrown weapon for each enemy as per page 270. As for "come and get it" its a goad. You're telling me it doesnt make sense for someone who is concentrating on defending other PCs in his party to goad the people arround him into attacking...

I am going to be running the Kobold Hall adventure in the back of the DMG for some friends who will be playing 4ed for the first time. I was wondering if anyone who had already played it had any comments on the adventure. Also, is it as hard as it looks? It seems like the combination of...

It even says so specifically in the descriptions for flanking an basic attacks that you can use unarmed attacks.

Nice catch! Maybe they did actually think this 4ed stuff through :)

From the OPs post it doesnt look like he did, although thats what he Ranger should have done.

I agree with the rest of your post, but what evidence to you have to support the boded statement?

Not by the OPs ruling that the ranger would only get one attack. One attack with no +STR to damage is simply worse than one attack with +STR to damage.

No, they dont. For the powers it states that you must wield two weapons. For the feat it states that you must hold two melee weapons in each hand. The difference comes up in that, at least IMO, a shield strapped to your arm and then using it to attack counts as wielding it, but not holding it...

For the feat or for the power?

Yeah, he would have actually be better off doing a basic melee attack.

It depends on it weight, but think about it, what, except for something of significant size or weight, cant be used as and improves weapon? And whats wrong with that? What it is essentially going to amount to is that a ranger will be giving up a significant amount of damage and bonuses to hit...

Well a one handed improvised weapon weighs between 1 lb. and 5 lb. A bow is either 2lb or 3lb depending on whether or not its a longbow or shortbow, so yeah, that should work as well.

With the OPs ruling all the ranger would have ended up doing would have amounted to a basic unarmed melee attack anyways. The fact that the ranger used Twin Strike didnt really make any mechanical difference. In the end its still just a STR vs AC with 1[W] for damage.