Search results

I feel like the questions thing might lead to statements like, "I use mental remembering to determine whether I've punched my DM in the liver lately." And I like my liver too much to deal with that.

This, in particular, makes no sense to me. I cannot even fathom how a game can take place if the players are not allowed to ask questions.

The Travel Devotion feat, from Complete Champion, is the solution to all of the Scout's problems, for at least one combat per day. It could also be useful for a flanking rogue.

Magic seems easy to us (the players), because all we have to do is say, "I magic it." Presumably, however, magic is hard enough that not everyone can do it (or wants to).

We're not heartless. In my game, if a character dies, we also kill the player. You know... put them out of their misery.

I think that metaphysical complications might be more interesting than physical ones. Though tieflings may not necessarily be evil, they are still touched by it, and this could show itself during the pregnancy. The mother (or even the father) may find herself or himself more drawn to, influenced...

I once played in a game where the player characters were all siblings.

This is not a problem that is likely to be solved by having a character with a "better build". This is a problem of differing play styles and differing game play expectations. You should have a talk with your other players (including your DM) about what has made this experience so frustrating...

This is sometimes a reaction to having a previous DM go immediately for the old, "Your brother/mother/spouse has been kidnapped by the bad guy. Now you have to do what they say!" or the, "elements of your backstory are naught but grist for the mill." For instance, I played briefly in a campaign...

I just wanted to drop in and say that I'm super glad that I found this story-hour, and even more so that it is being updated again. Your dry, workmanlike style of reporting is very fitting for the subject matter. I look forward to dread seeing what happens to your poor player characters next

You can, in fact, get a CRISPR kit on Amazon...

I am perfectly fine with characters (player, or otherwise) falling hundreds of feet with little consequence. In games that I run, I see no reason to alter the falling damage rules.

I think that's a great idea. If your players want to explore how magic affects the economy and vice versa, why not let them?

Its likely they didn't know he was available. If you send them a polite letter, there may still be time for some reshoots.

My original post was not an argument, but a statement of opinion.

That is your inference, not my implication.

Is there some sort of mysterious, invisible "all" somewhere in my post above?

It seems foolish to purposely build a roleplaying game that will not appeal to gamers.

Man, the people in the Terminator universe are so lucky. I mean, they're all pretty much dead, which sucks, but at least they don't have to put up with Facebook.

You need to decide if your stated principle (support my LGS) is worth ~750 DKK. If your principle is worth that much, then it is justified. If your principle is not worth that much, then it is not justified.