Search results

That is a picture of the Halfling Outrider PrC from Complete Warrior.

I think that it is negative energy that creates undead; thus whether or not the undead themselves(as far as the free-willed ones go) are evil they will detect as such because negative energy detects as evil.

I run 3.5 and one player's ranger has these two feats. I let him combine them, but I have a feeling they aren't supposed to be able to be though I cannot pin down any specifically restrictive wording. It hasn't 'broken' the game or anything, I'm just curious as to what my fellow ENWorlders...

I have an MP3 of The Ladybugs' Picnic. It's playing right now. I can't not sing along with it.

Aren't cans of worms the entire pointof the rules forum:D?

Savage Species has guidreliines for doing so, but not Bugbear specifically. Although I think SS is in the swirling chaos between 3.0 and 3.5.

Core as in PH only, or core as in SRD? If srd, then: Rogue is the most obvious; say human with str 14 dex 16 con 12 int 10 wis 14 cha 8, take imp init and ewp: spiked chain; at level 3, improved trip; take psywar1 at level 4, and the feat is psionic weapon(+2d6 damage for one attack);level 5...

The same thought occurred to me. An Elan soulknife would have a good ace-up-his-sleeve as far as staying power goes.

All I can can say to that is ... d'oh.:)

massive snippage here; hope this is not thus out of context. Bold is mine. The bold statement is an incorrect statement of the spring attack feat, at least to my PHB. The sentence is: "When using the attack actionwith a melee weapon, you can split your move action in that round in order to...

I've considered different possibilities using the a couple of templates: awakened lion paladin awakened spider necromancer with the undead cohort option(can't remember what book that was from) and rides around in its empty skull, shooting ray spells out the eye sockets. I guess the 'wierdest'...

I and my group are more casual gamers, and for the most part few buy anything. We play mostly core-only, as they are all brand new to 3e, if not PnP RPGs altogether. Recently, it has been the players shelling out more than than I(the DM), but it's just been dice and minis.

I like Vanilla. The ice cream as well as its adjectival use for ... anything. I'm unfamiliar with any negative connotations, though; the closest I can think of is someone saying that they are tired of the vanilla (fill in the blank), but that doesn't sem negative. If there are any, though, I...

Definitely fun, yes. This happened in a 2e game I played in in which my character was a demon hunter(title, not class) and the only way to destroy one known as Binquis was to convince the madman he was in cdontact with to kill himself. As the madman in question was a prophet of doom, the easiest...

As all my players are all pretty new, this hasn't come up yet. I have warned about confliting character types(paladin and assassin in party), but as a group they haven't even finished exploring all that's available in the PH so overoption deluge is not really a problem ... yet. Now that I think...

Doom had the chainsaw. Duke's claim to fame is the jetpack(not a weapon, but awesome for other reasons). The fantasy fps was Heretic; it was shortly followed by similar titles Hexen and Hexen 2, in which you could choose between fighter, cleric and mage; sadly, these had no chicken wands.

I voted #1, but #2 I think would be prety fun, I think. As I read throught the thread, I thought a mix of the two as a half-dozen session or so part of a regular campaign would be interesting. "The party and their nemeses were ambushed mid-battle by a powerful lich(necessarily insane, as liches...

Sniper rifle. Any game. Preferebly backed wtih a shotgun sidearm, just in case I miss and get spotted.

'Goblin' is always taken.

I voted 'fair' because it technically is. Why? They didn't HAVE to. I try to think of it from the view of who built the the dungeon. Why put this thing here, anyway? It's a huge drain on resources(lotsa money to boost that DC to rediculous heights) and, more importantly, is not protecting...