Search results

A 3 int is unplayable as an adventurer. You're as smart as a Tendriculos or Grick, for goodness sakes. No higher brain functions there. A 2 str can be played, barely. Granted, you will pass out from one ray of enfeeblement, let alone any STR poison...

Hmm, that's funny. I thought for sure the minimum 3 stat rule was in the book, either the PHB or DMG. I can't seem to find it.

Thanks for the responses. I'm definitely going with the druid.

If you're playing 3.5, then with that 9 charisma you won't be able to cast any of your spell-like abilities. And yes, you cannot have a stat lower than 3.

I had a monk called "The Master Hu Li," which was a name auto-generated from the original character generator from the PHB. The rolls the program gave were outstanding, equivalent to a 52 point character. He had an 18 in both WIS and DEX and flipped around the battlefield a lot. I played him...

Ok, I have to make a decision on a new 3.5 campaign that's starting. I have two character concepts that are made and I can't choose which one to play, and I'm looking for suggestions. The party is 5th level and has 6 total members, including mine. We have a 40-point buy system; we like...

Arravis: I think you would like it. It talks about whether you can apprehend, judge, and sentence a man before he has done a bad deed, and what if you're wrong. It has similarities to Logan's Run as well.

Droll means funny - is that what you meant? You should watch it. The movie is pretty good. http://imdb.com/title/tt0181689/

Alignment doesn't usually change quick enough in people you meet in passing in the game world. You judge them by how they have presented themselves. I really wish I hadn't been taken into an alignment thread. I dislike them with a passion. It's a game. There's good and there's evil with...

One doesn't get pinged as evil for a while after doing an evil act or thinking about it. They get pinged as evil because it's their inherent nature. And those are the ones the Paladin is tuned to finding and dispensing great justice (or doing something else appropriately).

If he spent the time to detect someone as evil, he should take it upon himself to deal with them one way or another. Whether that means to watch for them to do an evil act and hand them over to the local authority, or to interrogate and/or kill them in the lawless environment like a dungeon, I...

Evil does not mind its own business. Hey, that sounds like a quote from The Tick :) Since the kobolds are evil, they are offering an alliance for their own benefit, not the party's. They can also break that alliance and double-cross the party whenever it benefits them. Just because they...

By this argument, the paladin would have needed an atonement for colluding with evil kobolds to free an evil dragon for their own use.

Personally, I think your agument is flawed. But at least we can both have our opinions :) I can agree to disagree on this matter.

A paladin is a holy crusader against evil. Re-read the Paladin's description in the PHB. It says nothing about being tolerant to evil at all. If a creature is detected as evil, he doesn't have to wait for that creature to commit an atrocity in order to have justification to kill it - in fact...

I want to point out that Elder-Basilisk and d4 have some very good points about paladins. They aren't lawful stupid and will make smart decisions based on what is presented to them and the concequences of their actions. For them, there's always a balance that needs to be made between zealotry...

There is really no reason to believe that the kobolds won't turn on the nearby villagers of Oakhurst. After all, the goblins are already causing trouble with them. I doubt that a paladin would want to leave known evil creatures and possibly have it on his head that they would do Oakhurst harm...

Very nice work!

Am I the only one surprised that there are only two pages of errata?

Most definitely on all counts.