Search results

Adult/Ancient Chromatic (Evil) Dragon 20👎🏻 Beholder 24 Death Tyrant 11 Dracolich 12 Elder Brain 3 Kraken 12 Lich 27 👍🏻

Yes, this sounds promising, but we’ll have to wait fir the details.

Adult/Ancient Chromatic (Evil) Dragon 28👎🏻 Beholder 28 Death Tyrant 19 Dracolich 10 Elder Brain 12 Kraken 16 Lich 28 👍🏻

What do we know is confirmed gor XGE?

I agree alignment is not personality. I’m just not sure if I would use both systems. I find alignment to not be all that useful and thought this might be a good alternative.

Volo’s page 104 says “descended from humans” and “celestial heritage” and “an assimar is mortal.” That doesn’t seem clear to me, pretty ambiguous actually.

I'm guessing Mike doesn't really want to answer. My question would be, since armor doesn't add to their AC but Defense fighting style requires worn armor could a tortle wear a chain shirt (or whatever might fit their body) and have a +1 to AC?

Of course that would be tough. but if the boulder had legs to brace against the ground and arms to try to push me away, it would make it more difficult not less.

I'm imagining the tortle withdrawing its head, tail, and limbs inside its shell when it uses its Shell Defense. Is there another possibility? How would that help from being grappled, pushed, etc. if the arms and legs are inside its shell, and it cannot see ehat is happening? I guess it has...

It's 28 pages. There are 3 new monsters plus statted tortle npc & tortle druid as well as 3 specific ToA tortle guides. There are some adventure hooks and then most of the rest is campaign descriptions of locations on their island.

I'm thinking my next PC will be a Primeval Guardian tortle GWM with a glaive.

I'm trying to think of how one would ever need advantage on a Strength check when withdrawn into its shell.

Faster than a dwarf seems odd. AC and shell defense seem powerful. Description seems fun.

Tomb of Annihilation has a Dramatis Personae in page 4. Acererak - name pronounciation = ah-SAIR-ak

Does that sound how you and others see it playing out?

And, as I have said, not so strangely, the only part I see a problem with is your "starts to run" statement. I apologize for the confusion, but I did address this earlier on this thread.

I agree the effects are the same but think the path matters. I'm fine if we disagree will let it go but wouldn't mind if others weigh in.

Sorry. I responded to your response, thinking it was Ovinomancer, to whom my quote that you replied to addressed:

You said the wizard would get a chance to dispel before the knight "starts to run." It's cause and effect. If he didn't act first to move, then she would have no reason to even think about him, much less cast a spell to stop him from doing something he isn't doing yet. Perhaps initiative and/or...

I still read it differently: the difference I see is that it says the weilder of the staff casts a spell using the rod, that spell can be dispelled. On the other hand dispel failed to disrupt the staff's magical properties, which to me would be the One Ring turning its wearer invisible - there...