Search results

Yes, Yes, and Yes.

Yes, what you mostly say is true, but let's say the divine caster has five 3rd level spell slots. One prays in the morning and has all five available. At 10 o'clock, the divine caster uses two of those slots up in a combat. She has three left at noon, and at 5 o'clock, she uses two more and...

Nope. There's nothing more about weapons like lances other than what I posted. There are no feats in the RC either, and no mention of any changes to Power Attack (that I could find), so the 'attack with a two-handed weapon' line from Power Attack still seems to let you take 2-to-1 on the...

The same thing can be said for someone who pulls his 3.0 books out in a 3.5 game, honestly. Or, the same thing can be said for Swift and Immediate actions. For someone who has the FRCS but not Magic of Faerun, where some of the 'core' FR spells were updated. Or the SC, which updates some of...

There is a feat somewhere. The Master of Many Forms in our campaign has it. I can't remember what it's called though and we don't game for another two weeks. However, I *can* say that it's from a WotC book, not a 3rd party source, so that might help narrow things down.

Except it's not. The RC is the 'Primary Rules source' that trumps any prevous rules source. It's now not 'up for debate', it's the way it is. Fortunately, most of what I've read so far from it takes out a lot of the ambiguity. The FAQ was only intended to provide clarifciation (which people...

I vaguely recall there being a dissention on whether lances gained the 1.5 x or not. Now it's clearly called out. Just the normal Str modifier for one-handed weapons.

The only mention I can see so far to 'off-hand' is in the TWF rules, but granted, I haven't read the whole book yet. It's also not in the index. I'll do some more research and post if I find anything. (New info added below) And yes, it does mean that the off-hand attacks with the two bladed...

Except there is still risk without SoD effects. Unless you mean "I prefer a game in which there is a real feel of arbitrary death".

Because *nothing* makes players want to watch each other's backs and help each other out like punishing them for it...

That was fixed in the Errata that was released. I think the "Enworld Project" is for spells that weren't changed in the errata.

I've already made my feelings on why I don't like SoD effects on another thread. I'd like to point out though, that I don't consider something like Flesh to Stone a SoD really. It's *much* easier to overcome with something like Break Enchantment, a spell that's Cleric, Bard, Paladin, and...

Except the FAQ isn't wrong. "An unarmed strike is always considered light, as is an off-hand attack with a double weapon." (RC, page 148) So, with regard to the OP's question: You have to take the penalties to get your Dex modifier on the off-hand attacks with a double weapon, since it...

Hahaha! I love that idea! ::scribbles down notes for her next character::

And, at that point, why not just call it the Duskblade..

QFT. Of course, if your character has Combat Reflexes and the opponent does something provoking a second AoO after standing back up, then you can trip again.

No 'supposedly' anymore. Completely substitutable for a melee attack.

They just need to better organize all the different elves. Instead of what they have now, there should be: Urban elves, country elves, forest elves, mountain elves, desert elves, jungle elves, subterranean elves, freshwater elves, seawater elves, ethereal elves, and if the setting supports it...

I don't know.. even today we have things with less than good or perfect flight (fighter aircraft) that 'tumble' (via all their maneuvers) in an effort to 'not get hit'.

Yep, which is how I've always played it anyway, because I can read text on newspapers/books/whatever when watching black and white tv shows or movies.