Search results

Wait, $30(!!!) for a PDF with NO ART? Did I hear that right? I can buy fully illustrated PDFs for half the price on DTRPG. I can buy fully illustrated HARDCOVERS for $30. I'm all for fair pricing of RPG materials... but that's pushing it a bit, isn't it? Isn't the art the expensive bit usually...

Are you not able to see the video?

I haven't fully explored either of these. Can anybody who is familiar with both give a quick summary of the differences?

I'm not quite clear, but does that mean this is AI generated art or human made art touched up with AI tools?

All that O5E layout... and the O5E red swash on the front mimicking the D&D cover swash. I'm no lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that's not OK. And even if it was 'legally' OK it seems a bit on the nose to disguise an A5E product to look like an O5E one. Plus the interiors exactly mimic official O5E...

It’s all opinion and taste. We just have different opinions and taste.

Sorry. It's not to my taste. But I'm glad it works for you! :) Exactly! I really like this one, others may like other ones. Though with folks saying that things that aren't in A5E should be on the A5E sheet (precalulated skills, a set initiative score etc.), I can't agree with. I guess...

Hit points aren’t just for combat. Wrong game. You can’t calculate A5E skills in advance. And a list of +0s is just wasted space. Yeah the mission heritage is odd. Different play styles. Burying character stuff in equipment is how to ensure it never comes up in play. I tried the H&H sheet...

Now THAT’s a character sheet! It’s gorgeous! I have a couple of niggles like equipment not being being enough and a couple of other things but it’s one of the best sheets for DnD I’ve seen. I’m glad publishers are realizing that graphical design is really important for the eye. It makes it so...

So this guy had one tedious chat with a WOTC guy, who said a couple of bland things, and he's posting each one as a special 'exclusive interview'? 1. 'We might revisit old settings again' 2. ' We read UA feedback' (really? that's an 'exclusive'?) What's next? 3. 'We like dragons' 4. 'We use...

How does it differ to Level Up’s Trials & Treasures? It sounds very similar!

Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

Not really. It's just an admin mailbox. They give a few admin bods the job of sorting through them and collating the data. It's not like they've given out Chris Perkins' own email address. Plus it's a good technique for directing peoples' criticisms into a private channel rather than them...

Snark aside, so the Discord isn't 'official' but YouTube is 'official'? How do we know which channels are 'official' and which channels to ignore as not being 'official' announcements? When they announced it back in January, this wasn't 'official' I'm assuming...

What does that even mean? If I do something and say it's not official does that mean it didn't happen? Sounds like a recipe for the perfect crime! :D "You stand accused of robbing Gotham City Bank!" "I didn't rob it officially your honor." "You're free to go!"

But you forget that echo corners are countered by the echo triangles.

A single thread isn't an echo chamber -- that implies the non-existence of other threads. A whole forum might be described as such, but for a single thread the term makes no sense. You can always simply start a thread with an opposing premise, rendering the echo chamber non-existent.

I definitely don't have the time to watch a 45-minute video of a man getting a table delivered. This is surely peak internet!

I'm curious why you were happy to listen to this, but as far as I could tell, refused to listen to Brink's interviews? You said about other interviews: