Search results

i'm not sure, but some where around 20th level commenor/4th level expert.

yes

"Harm damages a subject with negative energy that causes the loss of all but 1d4 hit points." "Regeneration (Ex): Fire and acid deal normal damage to a troll. If a troll loses a limb or body part, the lost portion regrows in 3d6 minutes. The creature can reattach the severed member instantly...

the troll would regenerate because Harm does not deal fire or acid damage.

gold as if 15th level.

hmmmm, I like the idea of a parrot familiar, I am stealing that (thank you). Its not really my campign, I play in it, and the DM gets a huge crack out of it. I was thinking about having the raven familiar because of the speak language and have it speak elf, but dropped it since we only have one...

the commonor could also have been concripted into a couple wars and survived, or fought off a couple bug bears and lived to tell, to add to his XP over his life..

So, be default all adventures know common. But does this mean they know it well? Has anyone played a charecter who maybe knew common, but didn't know it well? Right now I have a gray elf wizard who in his backstory has met 6 non-elves in his 145 years. How often would he have spoken common...

svirfneblin... just because.

its due to Savage Species. If their was a dicount, everyone would be playing awakened barbarian war horses

Re: Re: Re: Invis and Flanking I agreed with your reaction. Consider this* under my "ignore" list *this being the sages ruling

I agree

I've never played 1st or 2nd, so they're all new to me

and I thought this post was about the changing of the price of cheese and whine in 3.5. This thread sucks ;)

since two of my players each own cats, I'm yoinking this to see what they do. I think I'll just make it a normal cat... or a paragom cat...

I just realized I fall in the Loony category... I once had a svirfneblin (who was a monk) who would cut the heads of his enemies off, instead of going for the treasure.

thats for the clarification. I just read it last night and though "whats the difference between doing an attack as a standard action rather than partial action"

Probabbly been asked before but.... What exactly does this do?

sorry from dragging this away from a discusion on a fighter/wizard but..... whats so wrong about the toad familure? I've only used it with one of my 4 wizards I've played in 3rd ED, and that was because it was a dugeon crawl game with little RPing. I'd much rather have a flying familure...

it seems often the writers of WotC books copy and paste a simalur section of text and paste it, then forget to change a couple words. If I remember, it occurs in erratas (like Monster Manual I) as well.