Search results

I though I just did that. I don't know how to say it more 'to their face' than that. Are you suggesting I send them a PM?

Excellent work, I like them. Now if I could get someone to do most of Greyhawks deities Divine Feats ( Hint, hint!) so I dont have to. :) I think 'Tiamat's revenge' it too situational. Why not just make it 'whenever an attack hits an ally'?

I don't get it either. Its like buying a blue book, where everything within is blue and then bitching because something in it is blue. I guess this just shows how desperate and irrational some people get.

No, I am saying that: 'The game rules are a useful, simulative abstraction within the context of playing a game and constructing a narrative. At the point at which you decide they represent the "physics of the game world," you're on the verge of creating a game that has Order of the Stick style...

Did we really needed another thread about this? I'll just copy & paste the original's posters sig ( once more): 'The game rules are a useful, simulative abstraction within the context of playing a game and constructing a narrative. At the point at which you decide they represent the...

I feel sad for your games if you think 4E is the same as Diablo. Do you not Role play in you games? or do you sit in front of your monitor and Role play while playing Diablo? If any of these applies you should really reconsider you way to have fun.

In his best J.D. impersonation: "That 3E is one baaad Seeed!."

Is it wrong that for the last 4 pages of this thread I've been hearing Yakety Sax in my mind whenever I read the Imaro/Hong debate?

After reading this post here ( and a lot of related posts here and in other forums), I have to ask. Did 3E hurt our imagination that much, when the use of a daily power is a 'dealbreaker' for some? What happened to us?

I think it is a valid example. Some paragon paths allows you to re-use a daily, so implying that you improve in your ability to use it.

Lol

The problem with the 3E Wizard: (I saw this posted in another thread.) http://youtube.com/watch?v=5NTAAvJIGrs

If you really feel that bad about 4E, just ask for a refund or do the ebay mambo.

Wow, talk about missing the point.

Why do magic items belong in the DMG? And just beause you dont play at epic level they should remove that content?

What a surpirse yet another edition wars thread. To the OP : If you feel the PHB needed more stuff , what parts from it would you have removed to put the stuff you wanted? If you really feel that bad about 4E, just ask for a refund or do the ebay mambo. Red Box D&D had...

Congratulations and thanks for volunteering your time for this.This is no small feat. I have a question to ask: Will the OGC material incorporated into the wiki be from all OGC books or just from those publishers that volunteer their OGC material?

This will actually achieve a TPK.

You make a very valid point, one I hadn't even started to consider. I know many people who started with 3.5 who will switch to 4E, but how many that will start with 4E will even bat an eye at 3E?

So we only have 2 options: 1) They got a 'Special License' ( meaning the are paying extra for IP use) or 2) They are going the unlicensed way. From some comments made by GMS, I think they are going unlincensed. A couple of questions for Clark(Orcus): Did you aproach WOTC for a special...