Search results

You could say Death dealer is the Boba Fett of fantasy literature, he just had a cameo once and inspired a series of fanfic all over. :P I think this was the original image: Gath of Baal

Yup how could you make the '14 pieces' chapter from the first novel if not with minions? :) And I am sure there is a bigger number of folk who would not pick it up if it was for 3E or 1E. I think they are making the right choice for the right market. ;) But do not despair there are boud to be...

Wow! You done it Mr Goodman. /bow PS: Anyone know a good place online to buy these comics?

How about a Behir and a Remorhaz?

Well trying to get back on topic: This is definition from a Wiki- I like this one and I think it satisfies everything I know about RPGs. Rpgs have a very broad definition of rules , heck there was an RPG designed under de D02 system. Under this is 4E an RPG? Yes it is.

WAIT!!! Am I missing an awesome drinking game? Spill the details man!! I want in!!

I'll admit its kinda hard . But its not impossible. There are so many variables at work here: Lucky rolls Fighting in a corridor or a natural choke point Burning Hands+sleep spell Surprise round Ranged advantage

You do know that making fun of someone's opinion is not a good way to make a point? What he expressed maybe his acnedotal experience, maybe his GM was more lenient or maybe your DM was a killerdm. it's all relative.

This thread is very interesting, and it shows that a lot of people have very different perception of what 1e 'feels' like. I don't know what playing with Gygax as a DM would be, but I have read a lot of posts from Old geezer in RPGnet . From what I could gather they were just making stuff up...

Yes. I would really like to se what Mr. Peterson does with this. I see 4E as a very modular game and very receptive of changes. If Mr. Peterson can pull this off he will have a very nice niche in the 4E market and maybe able to pull off some anti-4E people on board. If he can pull it off, its...

This. I am going to copy this and paste this quote everytime the monster role conundrum is asked.

Got any links?

No. The problem was that Clark posted: (emphasis mine) Clark has admitted his error and has publicly apologized in various occassions(Kudos to you Mr. Clark), how can you still be claiming otherwise? Have you not been reading this thread? Or are you now talking about other threads?

But the problem here is not that 4E needs changing or imrpovement( every RPG needs improvement , that is what house rules are for), but his choice of words. We all know everybody likes different things, but because we like different things we can't go slamming another person for his likes or...

You sir, you should change your ENworld handle to Wisdom bonus.

I completely disagree. Like I stated earlier and Clark himself has stated, his choice of words were not the most appropiate and they were interpreted as mostly anti 4E propaganda. This coming from someone who has championed 4E since it was announced prompted the earlier posts here,and in RPGnet...

Okay , if instead of the actual PHB, we were to just cut away all the fluff description to all the abilities and those were replace with really mundane descriptions would that had made it more palatable for you? For example: Split the Tree You fire two arrows at once, which separate in...

And we as a community a lot more understanding. But we all have our faults. :) Just a quick question what is so wrong with this? Didn't bows in AD&D used to have a rate of fire 2/1? If its the notion of the arrows actually curving and hitting 2 opposite targets, well that's just fluff and...

If he had actually said it that way none of this would be happening. I guess its not the message but the way he expressed it, that irked people.

You guys missed this part.