Search results

Stop being a jerk, ok? I never said it was fine. If so, please directly quote me. You asked me what if the DM uses the change that 3.5 will make. There is nothing I can do to stop them, heck, I can't stop someone from doing the change now. I can't stop my DM from making the change now, and I...

The DM has always been free to rule 0 stuff. I have 2 dm's and don't agree with ever house rule they use. But I still have fun. Maybe talk to the DM. If they say 'I'm going to use 3.5 100%' they may be willing to have some leeway and rule 0 some things.

Just use rule 0 and go back to the original version when 3.5 comes out

"both heads" is it a double weapon? If so, right off the bat the +3 makes it 6, and with the ability scores that adds 5 right there. So discounting the special abilities, the ego is at least 11 (or 8 if its not a double weapon). Then you add the +'s to ego from the special abilities. The DMG...

I'd help, but I don't have the dragon magazine in question, and of course when I remember this thread I'm at work without my MM

Those gaurds should have taken those PC's out in one round. But thats just MO

no prob :)

DMG pg 22: Monsters as Races Manual of the Planes pg 23: Monsters as Races Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting pg 21: Powerful Races Some other books may have info (ELH and MM2 perhaps)

since you're discusing house rules, then I suggest the house rule forum :) Anything with damaging a holy symbol on a shield (which would be a house rule) would have to be a house rule. There is nothing offical about what you're asking (at least that I am aware of).

Um, botching the concentration check does not cause an AoO. It causes you to lose the spell, as if you casted it but no effects occur. From the SRD and The DM made a very bad call

I happen to like the way Haste is currently. No need to change it. Now I'll just have to house rule 3.5 to 3.0 some more :rolleyes:

I think you did right. A buckler is small, and I would say roughly the size of a helm.

Yep. Sure it has a to hit roll, but it doesn't do damage. If I use harm on a commoner with say 5 hit points, I drain all but 1d4 hit points. If I use it against that epic level barbarian with 500 hit points, I drain all but 1d4. I don't roll dice to see how much damage I do, I roll to see how...

sounds to me like all this DR stuff sounds like it would be a better Variant rule than an offical rule. But thats just IMHO

One of my co-workers's (from a job I had 2 years ago) son actually met Todd Pratt. He would play often with him and was part of his guild and then got free tickets to a game and met him. I don't know if her son still plays it.

Does harm have a critical if the touch attack roll is a Natural 20? No. So it wouldn't deal sneak attack. But if I use a inflict spell and roll a Natural 20, I have the possibility of doing a critical hit and will do sneak attack (if I have the ability)

they also have good BAB and other nifty abilities that full spell casters don't get. Their spells are ment to complement them, but they aren't spell casters. They're bastard classes

I agree its an advantage. If a DM uses "psionics are different," its much easier to cut through an enemie's SR, or ignore it all together, depending on the DM's rule. In one of the games I play in the DM uses psionics are different and SR doesn't apply. Where as the sorceror and wizard will...

HEY! I represent that :D

I disagree. There are no spells that deal with the CR of a creature (or EL or ECL), but a lot that deal with the HD of the creatures affected. Yeah, what he said