Search results

What levels/capabilities?

To counterpoint: Take, for example, a suit of full plate. I'm turning from a human into an avariel. Both are capable of wearing full plate. I would say, therefore, that the gear changes shape to fit the new form, in the same way that the full plate would resize if you turned into a halfling...

Man what? I will give you all the money I have. vs. I will give you all the money I ever have. Are those the same statement? Calypso

It means he now has a new spell on his list of spells from which he can choose to learn spells. Basically, he added another spell to the Sorcerer/Wizard list, except only for him (and anyone else he shares the knowledge with). So, then, if our 20th level Sorcerer reaches 21st level (or...

That's assuming your new form can even wear them. Which it probably can't. Calypso

And please tell me how, even if there exists a MWP(Bastard Sword), that implies that the monster entry you listed is erroneous? Calypso

Heh. Doesn't quite work like that. First of all, I think you meant Verbal, rather than Somatic, yeah? And: "A verbal component is a spoken incantation." Calypso

Indeed. Calypso

And, this is all a tangent. The original issue was an assertion that Monstrous Humanoids got the lesser of the two hypothetical weapon proficiencies. Which wouldn't give them full proficiency, and wouldn't jive with the monster entry. Calypso

Aware of the attack? So are we back to the "casting Charm Person is an attack, so everyone gets the +5 bonus" again? Depends on the situation. If it's a tense situation, then yes, I call for initiative. If not, then no. I would allow a PC to cast Charm Person on someone in a bar without...

We didn't miss it. We pointed out that Bastard Sword is an exotic weapon, not a martial weapon. In case you missed it. Calypso

And that would be the Ridiculous Test (tm) I mentioned. If Charm Person is an attack, then the target always gets +5 to the save, thereby obviating the need to specify special circumstances for the bonus. If that was true, it would instead say "The target receives a +5 bonus to his save...

Alright. My answers are: 1. No, unless he makes a Spot/Listen check. 2. No, unless he makes a Spellcraft check. 3. No. 4. Yes. 5. No. 6. Yes. 7. Yes. Calypso

Not to mention, why are we even arguing that point? That has nothing to do with the OP.

Bastard Sword isn't a martial weapon. You can USE it as one, but it isn't one. Therefore, no MWP feat for it. Calypso

By the way, I misnumbered my questions and didn't notice until you replied. And since I seem to have no way of sending anyone a message, I'm forced to post this to ask: Could you fix your post to reflect the proper numbering? Calypso

It's not a bloody mistake. Monstrous Humanoids are proficient with any weapons included in their entry. It doesn't say what kind of proficiency. Just based on that, I would assume they gain ALL proficiency. Including EWP. If not, then they could hardly be said to be proficient in bastard...

Iku Rex, I'm confused. You seem to be trying to make a number of different points. So let me ask you some hypothetical questions. I think we might be on the same page, and just arguing around the topic. 1. You're hiding in a bush. You cast Charm Person on Joe down the block. Does he get...

I actually found a pretty clear answer to this: Calypso

I'm sorry, but casting Charm Person at them does not count as an attack for the purposes of giving them a bonus to their save. The word "currently" implies prior to the casting of Charm Person. Not to mention that that idea fails the Ridiculous Test (tm). Calypso