Search results

Simple question: Without feats, spells, or class abilities, can you flank with a ranged weapon? Unlike some of my previous polls, feel free to argue as much as you like. Just keep it civil, and no patryning others. ;)

It occurs to me that the real argument here is whether or not you can flank at range. The whole sneak attack thing is a red hering. (A little slow on the uptake today...) Back to the flanking rules, wouldn't the transitive sentence "When in doubt about whether two friendly characters flank an...

I prefer simple Yes or No polls. Let the complications be in the explaination of the question in the text of the message.

I don't follow your argument. The rules on flanking say two things: What happens when you attack a flanked target and When a target is flanked. Anytime you have to allies on either side of an enemy, that enemy is flanked, baring the usual exceptions. It says nothing at all about an enemy...

Hey, folks! I am thinking of starting a poll on this topic to see what the general consensus is. Since I always seem to catch feces about my wording for polls, I figured it couldn't hurt to get some input on how to phrase the question for this one.

Cool, thanks!

Whoa! I missed that one entirely. Can you give a page citation?

Unequivocally. ;) I do apologize for my statement. It was uncalled for an added nothing to the debate. Slight highjack of possible relavence: Does a goliath monk strike as a medium or large creature?

Having the most endurance to argue doesn't make your arguement the correct one.

Sorry for the delay, went to bed after posting. Here is the relavent text for Mithral in the materials section of the DMG: "Most mithral armors are one category lighter than normal for purposes of movement and other limitations (for example, whether a barbarian can use her fast movement...

Thanks for clarifying, I was feeling rather slighted. :) As for problematic results, I say not at all! It is currently running 90.92% For, 19.09% Against. What could be clearer? Okay, what may seem like a side question, but trust me that it is applicable to the discussion. Do you consider...

Tsk tsk! Artoomis, not particularly classy to say that someone else's poll is closed when it isn't. :\ On the other hand, I do support starting your own poll rather then criticizing someone else's. I voted that a human monk can take the feat by RAW, since I have seen nothing indicating that...

:heh: Thanks everyone!

Actually, I was using caps to make sure that no one missed it. I also said please in the opening post to the poll. Much good as it did me... Thank you Plane Sailing. I really don't want this to get bogged down in another can to - can not argument. That seems to drive off everyone else.

Thanks for the replies so far. Does anyone have a page number for this interpretation? Also, what happens when you take the Extra Turning feat?

*sigh* :(

Well see, you didn't say human. *sigh*

I seem to remember reading somewhere that a Cleric's turn attempts per day vs undead provided by the class were seperate from the turn attempt per day provided by domain, such as against elementals. By way of example, Joe Cleric gets 5 turn attempts. He also has the Fire domain, which gives...

It seems there are a number of people on this board who either have literacy issues or no respect for the wishes of others. I suppose it at least keeps the poll on the 1st page...