Search results

Well, I would be interested in a more “historically accurate” coinage system. Not completely realistic, just one based in s.p, gold coins being rarer, etc. Of course, making an entire economic system for a game is a lot of work, and I don’t particularly hate the D&D standard prices, so I tend to...

I’m not going into an alignment discussion here, but analyze 4e’s gods and you’ll see where they belong in each alignment. And one page of off-target descriptions is not “support”; at least not appropriate one.

Don't have the book right here, but I remember: Raven Queen (should be N), Sehannine (clearly CN), Tiamat (in 4e is NE), Zehir (perfectly NE instead of CE)... The list goes on.

No, many gods clearly belong to other alignments that they are listed; as I remember, they don't explain much what is the Dawn War. True support is more than just some lines hidden in a book.

The book doesn't even explain the Dawn War, many alignments are just plain wrong, and the World Axis Cosmology has just a few lines about it.

Oh, I see. Thank you for sharing this experience! ^^

Ok, I'll respond both possibilities: 1) I do remember reading that quite well. 2) You're saying that because you don't know me hahahahaha. But that's an off-topic discussion.

I don't know what's the problem of setting-neutral systems. You just buy a setting book and it's done. Simple and convenient.

Sorry the trouble, but you got my curiosity: this player - who roleplayed a Paladin right - how he roleplays/roleplayed this class? As you can find at the beginning of this topic, I love classic, LG-only Paladin but I think the armies of Lawful-Stupid pseudo-paladins do not show the class'...

Honestly, I don't particularly care about how thrown weapons were so inferior to bows and such. This is a game, things are better balanced, and it's cool. Don't know why realism needs to ruin that.

*Final Fantasy Victory Fanfare* There's a reason why I'm still playing D&D ^^

Remathilis I believe 3e did it. 2e did it – it encouraged to create your own world and you perfectly can build your own cosmology, but all published settings ended up using Spelljammer and Planescape. 5e does not, however, having set the default setting as FR. Xeviat I think the core 4 races...

I remember in The Hobbit that the giant eagles could only fly inside a certain territory. An eagle said he/she could not fly further than a certain point because it's "men's territory". I still didn't read LotR and I refuse to see any movies until I read.

Ok. Thank you, guys. This is something important to my group: we are already taking too long to play (mental health issues), and this will make things faster. I shall buy one of them in no time. Thanks! [emoji3]

Even I, an avid fan of Nerath, agree 100% with you. There was no need to throw everything out, especially when that "everything" has a lot of fans. That's why I'm in favor of "setting-neutral" core books. They may have fluff descriptions of classes and such, but everything should be treated as...

Well, I'll have to disagree with you Zardnaar. In theory, there's no difference between "official" rules and "unofficial" ones. At practice, however, things are very different. Not all gaming communities are that open. I'll write about this soon enough. [emoji55]

Well, right now, I’m thinking about how to run a game in which the Earth is flat. This demands to determine “gravity” as being directed to the ground (below or above, depending on the side). I believe some side-effects are: 1.Time zones: Basically, in the real world, if one starts to move on the...

Well, I was always changing my pantheon here and there. I ended up creating some gods myself, trying to modify 4e’s pantheon to fit into the 9-alignment system. However, up until recently, I decided to include more “variety”; that is, different types of religion. This includes religions based in...

Guy, sorry but don't ask to me: I don't play 5e; I'm just giving ideas. I hope that was useful [emoji1]