Search results

To quote your link: In both cases, the first polymorph is still there and active, it just ceases to matter. That is, it doesn't grant any bonuses because the bonuses from the 2nd spell overwrite them. But when you cast the 2nd spell, you are a titan* not a human as a result of the first spell...

By that reasoning a druid can't be the subject animal growth after he polymorphs into an animal (even if its the same size as him, so we don't confuse the issue with the multiple size changing argument), as the second spell can't exist on the target without the first, so clearly its stacked...

But flesh to stone a. requires your opponent to have flesh and b. has no effect if saved against

But you don't remove the first spell... its still there, even if it is no longer relevant. If the 2nd happens to get dispelled, you'd revert to the shape of the first, not a human.

0. It works to an extent. You can be killed without taking damage, ie: 1. Undeath to Death is a good example ;) 2. get your saves/sr up as high as possible Edit: Oh, another flaw in your plan. "A creature must have a Constitution score to have the regeneration ability."

Sounds like this is pretty much what you want: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/sp/20040319a

Its hard to imagine someone using a bow one handed very effectively...

The naginata and nagimaki (polearms.. naginatas were 6' - 12' total length with 1' - 3' blades not dissimilair to a katana, nagimakis were offshoots of nodachis and were 3'ish hilt and 3'ish blade) saw a great deal of mounted combat use, also. I'm pretty sure europeans used 2handed weapons...

Doesn't matter if its improvised or not, its too big to use in one hand.

Seriously, lighten up. He's already said that what he meant by low magic was that as a whole his party is significantly under the wealth by level guidelines. How about just accepting that low magic means different things to different people and not take it so seriously?

It mentions it for the individual creature's that aren't restricted to one size smaller ;)

Well, that can be both a plus and a minus... however I just checked and imps have no con modifier, so its quite likely it will tend to be more of a minus than a plus ;) With a decent con score however, you'd find that leadership cohorts gain hp at a far quicker rate than they would as a...

Its a decent concept, but you're spending an awful lot of feats on it. You might want to investigate getting the imp with just leadership instead, then advancing it by character class...

You don't qualify for craft wand until 5th level and practised spellcaster is capped by HD, so you can't take it at 1st ;)

While rulewise you are correct your analogy is horrible. I'd go so far as to say most practitioners of judo probably didn't start off with karate... the two really have nothing to do with each other.

I disagree, by virtue of the fact that shadow magic exists. Just because something is illusory, doesn't mean it isn't real; and all they know is that its a form of illusion, not what type of illusion it is. Thus they potentially could still be affected by it, thus they don't have proof its not...

If he's a sorcerer and he metamagics it !

I'm not sure I understand this argument 'especially considering the base class that the person is coming from'. Since its ok for astral construct from the more 'specialist' psion to be better than the 'generalist' cleric's summon monster, does that mean that a sorcerer's summon monsters should...

Thats a good question ! *hides* Just for consistancies sake I'd probably require a free hand still. Altho my opinion of true strike isn't particularly high (my groups have never focused on 1 hit kill type builds, so its always seemed a bit underwhelming to me)

I'd still assume the 1 free hand for manipulating the components is required (after all, you have to fetch them out of the component pouch somehow...) This is supported (in an out of the way place) by the daggerspell mage PrC from Complete Adventurer: "A daggerspell mage can cast a spell with...