Search results

I've heard it described as "swords and sorcery in space," which isn't quite right--but it's pretty close?

And then there's the Backhanded Apology, which is an insult phrased as an apology: "I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand my point," for example, or "I'm sorry you are so sensitive."

'Twas a mimic all along.

I agree it's no longer "medieval fantasy" but that doesn't mean I think it's "steampunk." It's it's own thing. I'm not saying that's a good thing, I'm not saying that's a bad thing. I'm just saying.

Bad day on the construction site. Okay fam, I'm gonna be real with you right now. I have a hard time respecting any grown man who can't say "I was wrong" or "I don't know." Take responsibility for your actions, you child.

A large Hawaiian pizza, you say?

How it usually goes around here: "This is absolutely true and everyone knows and accepts it as fact." (Ten minutes later) "I'n sorry you misunderstood, I was just stating my opinion. You should just always assume everything people say on the Internet is an opinion, so this is entirely your...

But why do we care what third-party publishers do with the new stuff? They aren't really driving that bus, so to speak.

Why not? (Serious question, not trolling. I don't run or even own the 2025 rules. I'm just curious why you have such a strong opinion on the topic.)

I can be both arrogant and correct. Happens all the time.

I don't get a lot of red text but when I do, my reaction is usually something like "okay yeah, that was out of line, I should drop it" and not something like "how dare they, this is so unfair, fight me"

The nature of the "free" material is a popular topic in the discussion forum of the Backerkit page.

Holy cow. I got the email from Backerkit at 11am this morning as I was heading to the construction site. It passed its $100K goal by lunchtime, and is sitting at $296,751 as I begin my evening commute. That's an impressive pace for a non-5E game product. EDIT: I'm sure this helps: EDIT...

PET. PEEVE.

Welcome to the Internet! (This is my biggest pet peeve today: folks repeating nonsense, even after they know it's nonsense, simply for the sake of nonsense.)

There is. But even if you do provide context--if you know the video you are referring to is clickbait, please don't include the link. Stop spreading their trash around.

I don't know who needs to hear this, but please stop sharing links to YouTube clickbait. You are part of the problem.

True or false, sensational or plain, soothing or aggrivating, good or bad.....whatever it takes to get you to click the link. Even better if it starts an argument, because that generates even more clicks. Heck, you might even be offended enough to start sharing the link elsewhere, so others...