Search results

Something I can agree with. :D A valid interpretation however you are missing the change of state based on this interpretation. First off, a character is at -5 and casts a standard action spell for 3 points of healing. This brings him to -2. He is negative, and conscience. Then once the...

When it comes across as an attack that is one thing, disagree and prove your point that is fine. Disagree and throw a statement that calls into question a persons education, intelligence, or seems to be patronizing is another especially without proof for your point. I've already stated several...

I think you need this http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Unless RD

Intersting pseudo code. Thanks for correcting yourself about mine. Also intersting is the fact that you do not take in effect if the standard action you performed increased your hit points. the hitpoint variable would always be your current value. So you should have something like: if...

Agreed it does not say anything about Monday, and that is due to the missing default condition of your emotional state prior to determining if it is Monday. An exception clause attached to no clause leaves one wondering what the exception is for in the first place. Since you only are looking...

Yes they different in a subtle way. They are not grammatically equivalent I agree, as does a grammer checker. As the way I rewote is actually higher level and easier to read and understand than the orginal. So you can read the designer's mind? :D We have no official ruling other than all...

So now it is our basic logic that is flawed... :\ Reaching. :D No proof. As a programmer using this paragraph to write a use case and later a function for a program, the logic of it would indicate an exception. Such as: if hitpoint <=0 and action = move then EndRound else...

I'd have to say even the way you have rewritten the sentence I would still say there is an exception to the rule when your standard action increases your hit points, even more so with your version. That is how it reads to me. No different than if you had written: Taking move actions doesn’t...

I agree there are some people that I consider "rules experts" here, that is one of the reason I enjoy this site so much as the different views you can get on something that helps you think critically about a rule you have a question about or possibility a disagreement about between players. I...

Teaching without a license again? :D Twisted by me in your opinion. You are ignoring the english language in mine. RD

In your opinion useless and therefore ignored by you, but an exception to me. One that works in the benefit of players if they are ever in that situation. Which at least one of mine have been in at least once over the last 4 almost 5 years of my ongoing campaign. RD

I and many others do not believe Hyp or yourself have this right. It is not about not being able to admit when one is wrong, because if it was I could say that you, Hyp and others are in that boat as well. If I am wrong about something than I have no problem admitting it, unless of course it...

Very true....and probably until they do state what they meant by the disputed sentences means this little unforeseen quandary of a debate can go back and forth. It is a "common sense isn't common" kind of thing. :D RD

Strange that I don't see you on my list of professors. What might be your qualifications for teaching? :D RD

In this case, using the sentence you written here as is, there is no mention of getting a room for the night without breakfast so removing the clarification off the exception does not work to convey the same way. Now if you had written: "You get a room for the night without breakfast, if you...

I was going to respond to the smart ass remark such as this with something equally smart ass but decided it is not worth it. RD

Suggested it maybe, that I can accept, stated it, I did not. They are not the same thing when quoting someone. RD

It is not I that is playing around with the rules of the english langauge or attempting to twist the text to mean what I want it to. This is how I read it when I read it. I tend to analyze many things and if the second sentence of the two is there only to stress the fact that you lose a hit...

I fail to see where I ever posted that. I would greatly appreicate it that you do not credit me with something I did not say. Thank you.

Granted 0 and disabled is not -1 and dying but the part in the paragraph she is now in negative hit points and dying or you are now at –1 hit points, and you're dying. whichever version of the paragraph you wish to use, that is a clarification on the fact that you lost a hit point since your...