Search results

  1. G

    Jovar (superior weapon)

    looks fine to me. It's slightly weaker than a bastard sword.
  2. G

    Catfolk (PC stats + feats + basic unarmed system)

    seems over powered ditto, stopping movement with an OA is a fighter thing.
  3. G

    Catfolk (PC stats + feats + basic unarmed system)

    I don't see a need. They already have +1 ref from the +2 dex
  4. G

    D&D 4E (Baatorian) Green Steel in 4E

    well seeing as a +2 weapon is 1800 and the plus to hit is the most important part 500 seemed right to me.
  5. G

    Daywalker

    + = lol I think the undead traits would be less powerful than the darkvision :p no food, no breath +2 vs poison and disease The word does call out 'USE ME' If target is bloodied doesn't seem to fit If character is bloodies doesn't seem to fit either hmm . . . how about target counts as...
  6. G

    D&D 4E (Baatorian) Green Steel in 4E

    the cost seems low. it's on par with a level 4 magic item at least. I'd say +500 g for all three.
  7. G

    Marking via Dragon's breath

    did he attack them? did he choose the mark them? if yes, then he's marked them. Though only for one round.
  8. G

    New Class -- Historian (think Indiana Jones / Tomb Raider)

    You have to sell your soul to the wiki. to quote Morrus
  9. G

    Daywalker

    a no no for PC races, reduce it to lowlight my take on blood drain: Blood Drain-- Daywalker Racial Power You gaze into your enemy's eyes and sink your teeth into his neck. Encounter <> Weapon Standard Action -- Melee Target: One creature Attack: Cha vs. Will Hit: 1d8 + Strength Damage and...
  10. G

    Variant 'Sleep' spell

    yes for mook sleeping, yes Though it doesn't quite feel right.
  11. G

    EnWiki code of manners

    I should hope so :p I see it as the kind of thing that's worth talking to a lawyer about. It's a small legal issue, but still a real one. That aside you're right, if the community expectations are set right, there shouldn't be any issues. No one posts anything here that they expect...
  12. G

    EnWiki code of manners

    posting it on the wiki goes way beyond linking or reposting. It involves remixing their work into derivative work. I don't think it's a big issue, but the sooner we resolve it the better. I love the wiki.
  13. G

    EnWiki code of manners

    to put it another way. It's not ok to post other people work on the wiki. . .but it should be. and it would be if we all signed up for it.
  14. G

    EnWiki code of manners

    I agree, but governments have a habit of giving people the right to do it. But you, are just the man to solve it. By having people agree to have their posts wikified as part of the registration. The Wiki is extra soupy since in involves derivative works and it only takes one copyright...
  15. G

    Differentiating Races: Racial Classes

    I like the ingredients of your idea, just not how they're put together.
  16. G

    EnWiki code of manners

    public doesn't mean you relinquish your copyright. every thing you posted here is copy righted by the poster. While it's fair use to quote to reply or critique and it's fair use to link. Taking someone's copyrighted work and republishing it is infringement. The issue here is most the posters...
  17. G

    D&D 4E Anyone make a Binder class for 4E?

    so to go meta for a bit lets look into an optimized character with our current rules. I think right now warlocks, wizards, clerics and paladin are the best candidates for taking binding feats.
Top