Search results

wiki time?

That sounds good. Either that or stick to only three stats being used for vestiges Str, con, cha

that's why wiki's are good. It'll help keep are impressions in sync.

Warlocks have it as a class skill

:D Love the wiki

There was a reason cha was a dump stat. Str = (damage) (hit) carry capacity Dex = AC, Init (hit) Ref Con = HP, Fort Int = Skills (save DCs) Wis = Will (save DCs) Cha = (save DCs)

wikified updates and new material

can't be worse than my copy paste hack job :p Edit: checked it, looks good.

[crazy talk] the binding ritual as a skill challenge, the whole party working together [/crazy talk]

wikified http://www.enworld.org/wiki/index.php?title=4E_Binder (poorly wikified, but eh, it's a start)

That's ok. Creativity is much more powerful than equity. Just take a look at some 3E Uber builds.

which requires str Shouldn't a ranger have equal reason to boast int? In 3E int determined skill points so everyone had a use for int.

The balancing point is the 1d6 damage is wasted on the minion.

Since he bases his OAs off str.

I don't think of anybody else when I'm low on HP I touch myself

*giggle* yes *snicker* he can

I was thinking the same thing. Currently Int is a dump stat. str v con OAs v HP wis v cha nada v nada dex v int init v nada

twin strike with long swords + quary 1d8 + 1d8 + 1d6 = 12.5 homebrew monk fists + sneak attack 1d6 + 1d6 + 2d6 = 14 It's more damage, but.. you only do half damage on rounds where you don't have combat advantage.

'should be able to' leads to terrible game design. That was the biggest thing fixed in 4E A hulking giant 'should be able to' hurl rocks at people.

Action Attack roll attack The first two are well defined. But DC works of the third which isn't defined. It really is problematic.