Search results

Okay, Fib is on, his character sheet is made in all it's tedious glory. Oh, and when should we start posting?

Well, in my own home grown campaign that might work out, alas this is a living campaign and the prestige class has to be A. Balanced and B. work with the rules. Which puts some heavy restrictions on creativity in my book.

Sort of a mixture of both. Reflections of the wisdom of madness, perhaps in a divination aspect, as well as inflicting such things on others. As for the buffy example... never watch the show no desire too :P I had my fix of campy ickiness with Hercules and Xena. Malkavians are nice but I'm...

Wow, this is a long list... ah well, I'll add my 5 cents... Basically when it first came out I didn't have access to anything really, then I got the SRD and went from there. Because there was a lot of mix and matched things, primarily a bunch of things from 3.0 being unnecesarily (sp?)...

anyone? Help? :P

Woo, getting a little tight in here :D wonderful... anyway my personal definition of broken in regards to a spell is something so rediculously powerful that it truly does hinder a DM and ruin the fun of the game. I guess never having my fun ruined by any spells or abilities created in 3.0 and...

they're essentially spend a feat get a stat point. In epic levels you get one feat every three levels as is the norm. So we simply took the feats, X'd out the 'epic' indicator from them, and made them optional. So players could have their character training his desterity by jumping from small...

Allright, in one of the few games I played I was playing a warpriest of Clangeddin Silverbeard. This dwarf, dubbed Sven Ironstar, did indeed get higher attack and damage bonuses than the groups fighter. Normally he wouldn't know exactly how soon he'd expect combat so he'd wait until they were in...

3.5 Shapechange? Hmmm... little beefy, being an 'any' sort of thing. Perhaps change it so that it's anything to size Collossal that's equal to your characters level in HD... instead of x2 Still, quite the buff spell, but fitting for ninth level, wouldn't consider it an epic level spell exactly...

In the online living world I'm a member of (The 13 Kingdoms) we all declared that a persons normal feats (the ones at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, etc.) can be sacrificed to increase a stat. Primarily because we didn't think it something that one needed to be epic for. After all, let's say a PC abuses...

Heh, Maybe I'm just a spoiled DM who doesn't have 100% power gamers in my group and never really had a hard time countering such spells after a fashion. :P :D

The Polymorph spells I can almost agree with. However the ability enhancing spells I never considered too powerful. One of the few clerical spells handy even in higher levels. Still had the chance to get a simple +1 bonus to whatever stat bonus your spell was for or a max of a +3 bonus if your...

Well said! Thankfully the player in my group who likes to build PC's with a high Smackdown factor rarely repeats himself and values roleplaying highly. So he'll make a rather potent PC (especially considering my approval of free reign of the Mongoose Publishing books) who'll have a nice...

Hmmm... having trouble making my character... first of all distributing his stats is getting to me. How worth it would you guys say it would be to spend a feat to keep a stat from being a negative or for upping one to a 17 or 18? Also... was there some sort of minor alteration in the point buy...

Allright, I am a member of The 13 Kingdoms (you may notice it's thread here at ENworld) and being the creator of the god Lunakav I hope to make three prestige classes for his followers (not simply his clerics, but his followers as well). The god has the portfolio of Secrets, Madness, Moon...

I'm a DM for a group who has two players who are quite competent at playing spellcasters. They use rather creative combinations of spells and can be quite clever though not exactly what I would call over powered. I never thought any of the 3.0 spells needed any real adjusting, maybe tweaking...

Hmmm, Can't say I ever thought 3.0 spells were really broken... they worked well yes, but a troll still made mincemeat of a players 7th level 3.0 spell using mage. I personally think WOtC has a burr in their butt about game balance and looked at spells that worked often and decided to pussify...

I never liked the idea that mental negatives took double for every single physical one. I mean maybe if the campaign was one hundred percent hack and slash or something but my damn player had a sorcerer with a high CHA and a damn good diplomacy score totally avoid one of my encounters because he...

Hmmm... it does sound everly complicated. I'd say if your DM wanted to play with the multiclassing bit he should try by perhaps using the second edition thing. Doesn't really unbalance the game at all (IMHO) as the character tends to be a little behind but not too much behind all the other...

Hmm... whatever you do, try and talk your DM into using 3.0 cleric spell variations >.< IMHO spells got a serious spanking in 3.5 for the most part... though there are a few gems hidden there.