Search results

Since nobody's cleared this up yet, the scientist in question says he doesn't use dead cats, and he hasn't thought about suing dead cats. The article is from Germany's worst yellow press, BILD...

That's still two months to buy anniversary gifts, right? Tell me again the day before - just like christmas. :)

Alright, send me the chainmal bikinis and I'll make a sexy ENWorld review of it.

And you know, something thusly advertised would have my money for sure.

That I am.

I always used Beethoven, or some other organ piece.

Hey, now, Truman show is cool!

I always expect house rules. When I play a game with other people, I make a point of summarizing the rules beforehand, and every time people chime in with "no, that's not how we do it", be it D&D, Monopoly, Risk, or a card game ("We play seven card stud" - "I'm only interested in five card draw"...

I think superlatives are the best option to excite me, ever. But seriously, I always roll my eyes at the qualified superlatives people throw around: "This is the best center since Shaqueel O'Neal", "The funniest comedy since 40-year-old virgin", "The best sci-fi this side of Star Wars", etc...

Well, I can say that if necessary, I will make up a rule on the fly and review it later on. For example, if a player wants to get an NPC drunk without succumbing to the alcohol himself, I'll have to do something since it's not covered by RAW. So I might say, "Make a Fortitude save this time, DC...

I'm here. But where's Eric?

Yeah, ettin jurors for the win! I imagine "Twelve Angry Men" (I think that's the original title) with the ettin arguing both for and against the verdict :D

So the Eberron setting book tells us the basic house rules, and further supplements (like "Explorer's Handbook" or "Races of Eberron") give more house rules. How is that different from me giving a house rule document up front and later, when necessity presents itself, bringing new rules into...

And if a feat doesn't list this as prerequisite, it is not optional, is it? Otherwise, this quote says "Remember, all feats are optional, but these are doubly optional." No, the leadership feats are optional, but the DM is a meanie if he disallows anything else, because the other things don't...

You need ENWorld reviews, don't you?

Well, I've got a PDF file with all my house rules, including which supplement I have already allowed or expressively banned, and I only add new house rules in between game sessions and often after checking with my players. So if you were to play in my campaign, I'd give you that file up front...

It's not unfair, it's for the sake of the game. Maybe I want to try a rule that might be unbalanced. Maybe I think an option would be unbalanced in a whole campaign, but not in a short encounter. Maybe I don't like an option enough to work at including it into my story, but like the abilities...

Before I'll rejoin this discussion by reading the past two pages, here's a quote from "Heroes of Battle" that I find relevant to this thread: On the topic of "Leader Feats" (p.96) Thereby suggesting that all other new material is not subject to DM's approval, otherwise this sentence (in a...

What's especially jarring with RangerWickett is that as a Bachelor, he's got time on his hands to actually write, as he doesn't have to entertain his spouse. "And so we meet again, RangerWickett. But this time, I am the master, and you are the bachelor." And does that mean RangerWickett will...

You know what's eerie? yanggnome's avatar blinks at different times :) I'm NOT in, by the way. I'm a lazy consumer waiting to be entertained.