Search results

Nevermind... nothing to see here. ;)

This sounds awesome. Looking forward to having a read. (I am behind on my Patreon DLs - must get onto that ;)).

Quantum Rooster I think it was front page, but pt of description stated that another article (in 1 week) will be detailing some new fiends etc. :) EDIT: Oh there it is, right there. Go to top of page. Read desc of article. Last line :)

Cool. Welcome on board, (well, you were already on board, but now you are on the upper deck. I'll refrain from calling it the poop deck though). Looking forward to new articles right here :)

That is cool. Obviously I had to go through pausing for a little self-indulgence... and I found what I was looking for. :) Nice work.

Just thought I would put a shout out to our (Black Hill Games) first DMGuild product (though I have written a few EN5ider articles). It is only a small one to test the waters. It talks about slavery in the game and incs the following game rules: * Slave BG * Monk Tradition. Would love a review...

My point is that some players want to perform things similar to the BM but using a different way/system. Not talking so much to th monster hunter here. I agree, don't just bang BM manuevers and same superiority dice mechanic. I like to CHANGE the mechanic, but again, get sick of hearing, just...

Love the illustrations too :) Anybody tried (or inspired to try) any of these guys?

Hmm. I thought those here looked good. Cool pose on the displacer beast.

The problem (now that battle master is out there) is that yes, you need to do something unique with fighter archetypes. Problem is when you do, people just say, "Why don't you just add those as maneuvers to the BM?" When the whole reason for doing new subclasses in the 1st place is a for a play...

Woo-hoo, our first product up on DMGuild: http://www.dmsguild.com/product/179963/To-Serve?src=slider_view Hope you enjoy. :)

Post removed. plz delete.

conclave27. There is very little rules material in the article. I am sure it would be VERY easy to use with pathfinder. Can't recall how they deal with subraces, but I am sure you could make these combining them with typical dwarf traits.

I have several race ideas, if this proves popular I will submit some more :)

Well said :)

Yay. Finally. Happy to discuss and answer Q's that I can.

This will be cool. I have some stuff already to go. My only prob is, is there enough demand? How many people are playing this game? I have many threads on here regarding Cypher and very few to no responses on most of them? I know ENWorld may be a small sample size, but still? Anyway, it is still...

Anyone at all interested in a simple (champion-level-complexity) tank?

Yeah, but attacks are not that high either. You have to beat the AC by at least 5 to get ANY benefit from this and the benefits are very little compared to BM maneuvers. (+1 damage per raise vs rolling dice). I can't see this going to mad. It certainly did not in our 1 playtest. In fact, he felt...

On complication. BM. Roll attack. Decide if you want to use maneuver (and check SP that are left). Choose maneuver. Roll more dice. Apply effect. Adjust/track # of SP left. Is this any worse? (And if so aimed at players used to the ideas of stunts and/or raises). It actually seems easier to me...