Search results

I didn't do this on a dying turn, but you made me think bout it so you get to hear it. I was a playing a half-ogre archer in one game and one lone guy got away from us to go get help. He's running down this hall and everyone looks to me and ask "you gonna shoot it?" I replied I didn't have my...

Most cattle ranchers in oklahoma would laugh you off their land if you called tehm bovines. That may be their correct name, but cattle is the typical word used. Even cattle ranchers, however, call them *cows* be they male, female, or neuter. Sorry, just grew up around cattle people and find this...

Doubly so, but my first choice lately is Alicia Witt, I couldn't help gaping throughout "playing mona lisa"

Not a problem, i had seen people numerous times end with either as a wish you well kind of thing, sorry if i over stepped, didn't read that as being a specific ban. My apologies, it will be edited

No prob:) I agree, tensions can run high when something like this happens, it's such a sad thing and so utterably human that it always makes people feel a little guilty I think, we know that we're the only thing in nature that could do something like this and it's hard to not lash out when one...

I thought Dogbrain was joking on that comment, so I took it that way. I've been surprised how evenly this subject has been handled here so far. No yelling or calling names for the most part, that's pretty impressive, lol, specially lately.

Yeah, you always get *one* attack first. I have been in very few combats at even mid level that one attack decided it (unless it was a crit with a maul, that was fun). This feat only gives you *one* attack before the other person gets their attack. On top of that, it only works *once* a round if...

what? You consider a tree falling and crushing someone evil? You consider fire evil? I was under the impression that those are natural acts and inherently neutral. Could you call the acts chaotic-neutral? Yeah, you could, they aren't adhering to any specific sense of rule or law if they just...

I like it. One question, do you intend it to be limited to those with weapons? I love Zatoichi and would say this is exactly in line with the idea in that. If this is the case then I would leave quick draw in it and leave eveyrthing else like it is. However, if you want to allow monks to be able...

I like the idea, I have always had a problem with the fact that non-human races have all of these subraces but humans don't. The humans of one region are just as different from those of another as many of the subraces are from each other. No one has done a good job of this for humans yet, but I...

Sounds interesting. Wouldn't it be easier, however, to just say only half the normal number of opponents can surround the possessor? That should cover the same idea, this wording just seems a little clunky to me, but maybe I am just half asleep.

I had not noticed that, the weapon section of 3.5 our dm almost ignores (I also hate the whole weapon size crap in this new addition, makes the dm's life hard and the players of non-medium characters' life hard as well without adding enough to the flavor I think). If that's the case then all my...

I'm glad I am not the only person who got that impression bout darts. I agree that shuriken would work (and you can enchant three shuriken at once can't you? wasn't there a magic item like that?) but it still comes in a little short I feel and a lot of dms running strictly western campaigns...

People are approached all the time, I never said I was approached for anything fishy. They offered me a job, I am a history major speciallizing in China. Do you really think the CIA is some shadow group? They run their business like anyone else. The reason I got the interview was that my...

If you want to think that way, ok. Although I will say I do not believe in innocence, the only reason any of us are still here and not somewhere else is that we have messed up previously some how. Also, why would I feel guilt for ushering someone onto a different place? I know that for most of...

Well, we are using the 3.5 dnd version of good and evil, which is very narrow. Also, I would argue that in western civilization, good is very narrow and evil is very broad. And most of those comments were geared towards defining myself in dnd terms, which I stated was hard to me but I tried to...

How's that disagreeing? I actually agree with what you just said and never thought soldiers were apathetic, maybe ambivalent at times, but not apathetic. That is why I don't see them as lawful-neutral, which to me is the definition of apathy "I do this because the law tells me to, and i don't...

Just had this debate today on the floor. I agree that a lot of soldiers would be lawful neutral, but I still hold that many if not most are lawful evil. Lawful-neutral means true law, you follow the law explicitly, that menas you do not sneak a smoke on duty, you don't pay someone else to shine...

Wow, 1 pint of holy water takes 5 lbs of silver? I know you're right, it's just I never realized how ludicrous that is, lol. That's some supersaturated water, but I know the silver disappears when cast, it's just the image I get of a cathedral pouring in a hundred pounds of silver into their...

I should have been a bit more specific, yeah, daggers can be varying size and any well balanced one can be thrown. I was thinking more along the lines of throwing *blades* I guess. While it has been done with shuriken and darts I have a couple problems. In most games I have been in shuriken have...