Search results

Shouldn't that be "ban her" ?

Level caps! After all, that level is going to be altered again and again - right until it isn't, any more. ;)

You kill jokes? And then raise them? Don't cut back! Get the extra turning feat and do it more! Haven't you heard that bards won't be in 4e, at least not at first? :p

Unfun: No longer funny but not naturally boring. Jokes that have literally be done to death, but which aren't buried as they should be, but are still used again and again and again - those are the Unfun. Bards can Turn Unfun. Good bards do this by inventing and telling new jokes, Evil bards...

Can't say I heard of it. No wonder - I don't bother with German versions of the RPGs I play, so why bother with German magazines? But the translation page is useful! Anyone else want to buy expenditure 37 so he can along-pass on that campaign? :D Plus, those games of roles sound interesting...

What did you expect? d30 system? Class- and level-less? Sci-Fi setting default? All races with 2+ heads and 8+ limbs? :p ;) It feels a lot like a new edition. More than just an update, less than a different game. Look at the changes we already know, and we don't know much: Races work a lot...

Of course! Monte hates 3e! He said himself that he thinks that it stinks and was written by a bunch of hacks! :p

So far, the poll is quite clear: About 60% are against, and only about 25% are for warforged (Exact numbers 7/12/9/40/3), though there's more than twice as many real lovers than real loathers. If those numbers are representative, it looks bad for the forgies as a standard race, as I don't think...

Where's the "I have no idea" option?

Take the Cleric as an example: He's called a leader, and I read that they will "never be punished doing leadery things". That could mean that they don't have to forego their flame strike or attack with the mace if they have to heal someone. It's no longer "heal someone or attack the enemy", but...

I doubt that they will only take groups that have done playtesting in the past.

Well, you don't blow XP on everyday spells (the XP cost is another thing I'm not fond of), and the power has to come from somewhere. I think that with the special materials and the spell slots you use during creation, there's enough power to go around.

Since the other poll wasn't too conclusive, I decided to do a decisive poll.

You play for money, do you? :p How can they play when they don't know what they're playing?

I, too, hoped that the previews had more meat on the bones.

That idiot? He's... wait, I'm the DM a lot of the time. See? I know myself. If you think I'll trust myself, you're even madder than me! Guidelines are always nice, even if you overrule them. You take a look at a monster, see a number that indicates how tough it is, and you know whether you...

It's not templar, it's legate. Midnight Revised has extra "aspects" of Izrador. They have different domains to choose from, so there are inquisitor legates, warrior legates and so on.

Yeah, or what he says.

Just ignore the XP part. You have feats, and time, and some of the money. I think that's enough to pay. Otherwise, take a look at the Artificer's Handbook and see if it has something for you.

World of difference. Is it something that's quite rare and confined, or is it all over the place? Do I have to share my XP with it? Will it be on screen all the time. I have no problems with magical robots. They're called Golems. They don't live. They're not in my party.