Search results

Well...at least not according to ShadowStar. It's still -6/-10 according to his findings.

From what we know from ShadowStar thus far... it looks like with the advent of two-handed fighters gaining x2 strength bonus to damage and x2 bonus to damage from Power Attack I do not know if I want to play a sword & boarder or a two-weapon fighter... especially after finding out that the...

with the advent of two-handed fighters gaining x2 strength bonus to damage and x2 bonus to damage from Power Attack I do not know if I want to play a sword & boarder or a two-weapon fighter... especially after finding out that the penalties of two-weapon fighting is still -6/-10 (if off-hand...

I want to ask this again just to make sure...Does the Dodge feat in 3.5e gives you +1 dodge bonus to AC against one designated opponent or +2 dodge bonus to AC against one chosen foe? You seem to imply that it's the same as 3e (thus +1 dodge bonus to AC vs 1 selected enemy) but I want to know...

also check out the 13th lvl line and compare that to PHB the new revised spell per day is in error (if it's not an intended change that is).

ah you are right! The page count for scribing spells have decreased, according to Roy, in 3.5e. My bad...this is what you get when you never play wizards...sigh.

....Well, the current cost in the PHB 3e (second printing) is exactly 100 gp per page...apparently the cost per page to inscribe new spells did not change in 3.5e.

I sincerely agree with Vivictus and EricNoah...I believe in you my imaginary cyber friend RoyTheOdd!

Nice Avatar btw Nightfall. :) Goes well with your name.

I do not think steel pieces as currency is silly...just as we use monies made of papyrus (even though our modern society is far advanced, D&D society with its magic replacing technology is very advanced as well)...nope not silly at all (although I remember there this one time, at band...

let us suppose a medium-sized finesse fighter with low strength but epic dexterity attacks a nigh invulnerable monster such as a colossal dragon (a monster so well protected that you can see overlapping plates covering its sensitive parts). I don't know about you but IMHO that well...

let us suppose a medium-sized finesse fighter with low strength but epic dexterity attacks a nigh invulnerable monster such as a colossal dragon (a monster so well protected that you can see overlapping plates covering its sensitive parts). I don't know about you but IMHO that well...

I see it as more of a concentration issue...as you can only focus with one hand more during a combat round (each round, this concentration can be shifted to your previously "off-hand" 'cause of your ambidexterity). Otherwise, if you can put equal strength for both hands you are concentration...

It boggled my mind too at first...I'm thinking they made a mistake with that one and should have bold it.

You know, reading this thread here reminds me of the good ol' WarCraft 3 Beta Forum where there are many people complaining about this nerf, that shaft, and there brokage that assaulted their favored race at that paticular patch. Spellcasters are not shafted IMNSHO...granted I will have to see...

That is correct although both would be also useful for your Big Bad Guy/Girl.

.....but they don't have darkvision......rather low-light vision.

Gnomes have a real niche now me thinks...

so a dragon has to shrink to medium-size in order to reap the rewards of the potions? Doesn't make much sense IMO.

Any chance I can get hold of Bob's amazing, fantastic, steam-powered, calculating Excel spellsheets (provided it's free of course)? :) Much thanks in advance!