Search results

I hope that this strategy is not also problematic. Sure, i can understand that too many sourcebooks was an issue, but too few could also create the feeling that the system is not properly supported. I thought the Advanturer's Handbooks twice a year would have been fine. Anyway, now it seems like...

My only concern is that is seems that the two classes that get the most ability increases (and thus most options to trade them for feats) seems to be the two classes taht just need one ability anyway, while many classes that rely on having at least two abilities with high values only have to do...

Again, no! It is build like a player's handbook. It refers chapters that are missing (like the entire section about Backgrounds and thus it is not complete to actually build characters with it). And it is clear that it was written after the latest public playtests (and normally alpha tests...

Of course in mean it is not one of the public testing. But I don't agree with you that an alpha version has to be a playtest version, after all we are not talking about a video game here, and thus we don't have alpha, beta and open testing.

Make the Charisma save Etiquette! By the way, Acrobatics is important to check on how good the performance in bed is! Or is that not the reason for that skill?

I have looked into the alpha version and can tell you, it is not a playtest version. Sure, some things have changed, but after all it was the alpha version, so that comes not too surprising.

Since 5th Edition has no urbal social knowledge skills I would add maybe one or two, like Streetwise (low society) and/or Politics (high society) or maybe put them together as Culture. I personally plan also currently a very urban heavy campaign for 5e, but since there is the strong possibility...

Especially since we have skills in 5th Edition (or had already since 4th Edition) like Athletics that do what many different skills did in 3.5 is my reasoning to put a few old knowledge skill together as Culture. History existed as skill beside Knowledge (Nobility and Royality) and Knowledge...

The thing is Bachgrounds like Criminal and Noble might have some of those aspects, but when I want to have a character that knows how to deal in both kinds of societies, and maybe even want to know how the Hobgoblins, Gnolls, and Orcs in a region are thinking about each other, if there are...

I would have like to have a comment in the basic rules about the skill list being open to add your own skills or that it is meant to be only those that are given. I mean I miss a social knowledge skill. Sure, I can understand that streetwise or Knowledge: Nobility might be a little to specific...

I am not happy that there is not an broad social knowledge skill in the basic rules already, guess I have to invent my own skill for that (thinking about calling it Culture) and deal with the stupid players arguing about how adding skills will ruin the game balance.

I am missing a social knowledge skill. It seems like Streetwise has not made it to 5th Edition. Okay, I can see that it is kinda useless in some campaigns. Same goes for the good old Knowledge (Nobilty), which did not even made it into 4th Edition. But why is there now no social knowledge skill...

At Level 6 I have taken the Feat for my RPGA Rogue (before the PHB2 I have thought about taking Nimble Blade, but Weapon Expertise is by far the better choice)...

Many Dailies from the Warden don't have the Weapon Keyword, so they can't have an Enhancement Bonus or the Benefit from Weapon Expertise....

I think the Expertise feats are the worst bug-fix I have ever seen. It ruins player choices (cause other bonuses on attack rolls from feats are weaker), it makes the Warden weaker (cause this class has Powers which are neither Weapon or Implement, like all his level 29 dailies), it makes classes...

I see there was a change needed, that characters at high Level can still hit the enemies, but the expertise feats looks like a solution that invents a new problem. For me 4E is about choices, but this feat is no choice, everybody has to take it. Why has WotC not invented Masterwork weapons and...

I know people who show developers of card games (L5R) what they can do with their cards, sometimes the developers are surprised (but they don't change the mechanics to forbid it). So even card games are not always perfect, but I think if players find strange ways to use the rules without harming...

I hope that the game's developers see no harm in it at allow the use with the Javelin. But still I ask to myself why they haven't written Basic Melee Attack in the first place, if the intention was nothing else...

Your ally can act again, that's right, but after him is the Dragons turn, because the new Initiative order is: Joe: 20. Mike: 17. (who acts after the Warlord) Dragon: 16. It is not possible as a demigod to kill the dragon before it even acts...

Is there anybody who will ask this question for the FAQ, I would do it myself but the Wizards webpage hates me, I don't get any e-mail address...