Search results

Whoops! Browser Settings Incompatible For me it depends. The 4 hit point mooks in room 5? Just use TotM. If we are talking about Thar the orc warchief and his 2 dire wolves who are the set piece encounter for the adventure ? Then yes use the grid.

I wish them well. Not interested in someone's "DnD done right" ...

This is what I would expect Paizo to do. Hold the line and only make changes if need be .

Agreed. While their (Paizo) adventure path business most likely will remain as is, the rpg side (core book,splat book) could in theory take quite a hit.

LOL @ Paizo making D&D 4.25 comment

A shorter time commitment to playing may mean more people buying in.

Possible... maybe I am getting my leaks mixed up. Anyhow wasn't the playtest at D&d xp version 1.0?

So the something awful leak was playtest 1.0 . I wonder if 4.0 is the version that we'll finally see?

Wow, at first its " wotc is throwing 4e under the bus!" . Now its "wotc is including 4e stuff , I am out!" They can't win.

I am wondering if some comments that have been dropped around the interwebs today point to the public playtest beginning soon. Admittedly the "evidence" is me reading between the lines quite a bit, but hey it's fun to speculate right? This from Mike from his last L&L article " " Yeah there is...

Yeah , add me to the list of 3 hour games , we play once a week . All nighters are a thing of the past . I need a game that moves along at a fast pace, so I am digging a lot of what Mike is saying .

Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game Official Home Page - Article (A Menagerie of Topics) Hopefully the public play test begins soon. Discuss

I like how you think. I think that they should only have 4 classes and then multi-class plus feats/talents to make others. Multi-classing doesn't work in all cases though. Some classes from previous editions should be variations of one the big 4 Warlord, Barbarian - a fighter Variant Sorcerer...

I will be in the minority and say that I would prefer the concept of 4 "roles" if you will (Fighter, Rogue, Cleric, Wizard). Because almost every class that I can think of, except for a few are just variations of the theme. The exceptions are maybe the Warlord, Warlock, and Sorcerer?

"what are weapons good for?" Um...Killing stuff of course !!!

Dragon Age allows for multiple stunts on a turn. If when rolling you only have enough for one stunt then yes there are ones that are better than others. If you could do multiple things, like only make one attack, but had enough actions to disarm, or trip, or whatever, then yes it would be fine...

So it is looking like there is no attack bonus progression like there was in past editions. Assuming this from the "leak" plus comments from the last rule of three. No defense progression either. No BAB like 3rd, no half level progression like 4th. At first I wasn't sure what to think about...

Yup , and everyone keep in mind that this is playtest 1.0 ( assuming this is real) . I am sure early versions of (insert game here) didn't look all that good either. Keep in mind this would be the core rules ... what you would use to emulate od&d, 1st ed, becmi etc. It's not going to look like...

Snipped

I liked the idea of a cleric and a priest being separate classes. Won't be core though.