Search results

That might be a good way to go. Whichever class gets the least votes for that round is the one that's kicked out.

Yes! That would be awesome. :)

1e - Wargames 2e - LARPs 3e - CCGs 4e - MMOs

Well, if you're willing to wait ... Underdark may be up your alley. ;)

Well, I got the rule change, so I voted for the one I wanted (go fighter!). But ... until a new class survivor is done and presuming the fighter wins, we will never know if the fighter won because people wanted him to be the last survivor *or* if people were thinking they were voting it off the...

I could live with Cha-based warlocks, but I prefer Con - now - because it doesn't feel redundant with the sorcerer. Fluffwise, perhaps dealing with Things Man Was Not Meant To Know (tm) puts enormous strain on a person's life frce and/or body. Those with vitality and durability are best at...

That would be hilarious. :) I bet there are metallic kobolds, who are forthright, honorbound, noble little guys. (yeah ... right... ;)

I'd base all their attacks on Constitution. I'd also give each pact something like vestiges. For infernal pacts, it would be various archdevils (Dispater, Mammon, etc.). For star pacts, it would be the hungering stars (Gibbeth, Hadar, etc.). For fey pacts, it would be archfey (Prince of...

Hmm, would you be able to share the breath weapons of the "new" metallics, por favor? :) I don't want actual stats, just a descriptions of the type of damage and maybe any rider effects. I think with Draconomicon 2, I'll really be able to dive in to a faux Dragonlance setting I'd like to run...

Die, Wizard, with your lack of Controller-y at wills!

I don't have my copy handy, but it sounds like it could be used in situations where you don't have line of sight/effect to the target. Like, around a corner or something.

Here we go. From July's Design & Development: And from the Cerulean Adept PP in the Psion preview:

It'll take me a second to dredge up the sources, but in the assumed setting psionics (at least the style of psionics practiced by psions) is a relatively recent innovation. So far, we've been told that psionics arises as the world's defense mechanism to Far Realm incursion (or, perhaps, because...

Blibdoolpoolp is one of my favorites. :)

Yeah, I remember when 4e setting info was released describing the ancient conflict between the gods and primordials, the cynic in me wondered if WotC was going to be sued! Same here. :)

Here are my theories... 1) Too many similarities between alchemical "gold" and real gold 2) They didn't want it too look like Exalted ;) 3) They thought "orichalcum" was too hard for the average person to pronounce 4) They wanted to find a way to tie in Red Steel :)

Cool, thanks! They all look like nice additions to the metallic dragon family. :) That is indeed a lot of dragons. Not that I'm complaining, I like reading about them. I just wonder how the chromatics will keep up! For colors, we have yellow and orange left, but what else? Puce?? ;) I know...

What are the personalities of the "new" metallics? (new to 4e, that is :) ) Like how copper dragons tend to be miserly and silver dragons tend to be knights-errant. I'd like to know their breath weapons and monster roles too, if you would be so kind. :D Thank you very much!

I recall reading somewhere that steel dragons were one of the new types of metallics being introduced. This along with brass, bronze, cobalt, and others gleaned from the annals of D&D history. Things like radiant dragons, whatever those are. EDIT - Here's the link: Cobalt is one of those...

*gasp* Oh man, I need some of the spoilery info...