Search results

the 5e reddit channel is cutting or blocking any posts talking about the new 1.1 OGL, and blocking posts linking videos talking about the subject, possibly at the request of wotc. Ironically, there are several conversations about it on the PF2e reddit, and no moderation at all...

Its possible, that's why I asked.

Ah ok, I did also find this link to the original PRD.

They do have their own SRD on the hypertext d20 website called the Pathfinder Reference Document or PRD. & the pfd20srd has the PF2e SRD.

Pathfinder has two separate SRD's for 1e & 2e, these aren't owned by wotc, so presumably one could continue to use the 1.0a in conjunction with the PF1e/2e SRD?

I don't have any opinion of him (didn't really look into these things to be honest), & I have never played Zweihander, I'm just reporting on the current developments.

Daniel Fox of Zweihander RPG was in the live chat, stating that he has read the entire 1.1 OGL from end to end, and that he can't comment yet (likely NDA'd), but that he will be making a statement after wotc's next official statement, and that the new 1.1 OGL is in his own words "undesirable."...

Yeah I don't know myself, this is becoming surreal. I'm just reporting the pertinent information so that folks can stay informed as things develop further.

Your own statement is quite contradictory however, because its not an either/ or situation. The MtG community is not a single cohesive unit like you portray it as. Collectors, Investors (& speculators), Players (casual), Hardcore players, & Whales are all part of the Mtg community, a community...

While I personally have no idea how they expect this to happen, or if is even legal, it doesn't discount it from being a possibility that they can threaten future publishers with the new 1.1 OGL without having to go to court. And its not really one week, according to the video they (likely...

Ok so I have been on this all morning. I have timestamped the video in this post to playback where the youtuber reads what sounds like a direct source email regarding the new OGL, which he claims he received about two to three weeks ago. (I had initially said that this guy was most likely...

Exactly what I was referring to in the other ogl thread, that we should be communicating our concerns now before the final draft of the 1.1 is made public, because it will be much harder to change anything once the 1.1 OGL is set in stone.

Well I don't know, I really hope this is not as bad as they are making it sound.

If they could have revoked the 1.0a by now they certainly would have (see 4e GSL's original poison pill). It's an argument that has been ongoing for 20 years. This is likely a misinterpretation do to the fact that this is likely second hand, or possibly even third-to fourth-hand information...

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink. At least you are trying, that matters to me at least.

I have already said my piece on the new ogl, but I just wanted to remind folks that while the final draft has not been released, there is still time for them to make changes right now before it is released. I think that right now, rather than later after the release is likely the best time to...

Excellent on the prep time. I still tend to overdo prep ahead of a campaign, but that saves me a lot of time later, as in between games it takes about an hour to half an hour to prep a single game of 3.5, these days anyway. Oh yeah, that vampire template never worked for me, i had to make my own.

Absolutely, whatever works for your table. E6 should theoretically be easier on new GM's, but either way works.

Thankfully, cooler heads prevailed, and at the end of the day we are all still here. ;)

Happy new year folks, and many more to come!