Search results

again this only works if you already did the leg work and the discussion... again I am not saying WotC is better, Im saying its an easy "just one"

IT isn't just them wanting broken stuff (but look at my screen name i know people who that is true for) it's Ross wanting a new cool warlock pact, and Jim wanting the werewolf class from this, and kurt wanting just these two feats from these two books.... it adds up

agreed

1 new book per month (heck sometimes 1 new book per 3 months) compared to say 10 compaies putting out anywhere from 1 a month to 1 per 3 months...

I think of it as 1 company vs manuy myself. I actually double hit the 0 on my phone, I meant 20-30 the 30 was right not the 200 but I can see you had a 50/50 shot of getting my meaning. my fault for not catching the typo if I was playing zelda on my switch sure... but I play at 2 tables a week...

4e already has a lot of "add X or Y" where X or Y may be +1 +2 or a stat... useing advantage would let them stream line some of them... Take teh warlord (my favorite class) if you had at wills and 1st and 3rd level encounter powers that gave advantage on things(the at wills scale to add a...

I think you mistake "I have enough on my plate with 1 company without adding 200-30 more" with "oh this one company does no wrong"

I hope you don;t mind a slight sreail... but this is my rpboelm with 5e as is and why I wish we were getting a more ondepth rehaul... 2 7th level front line melee characters running through he same adventure with the same level of optimizations, but 1 is a fighter (any subclass really but lets...

that sounds pretty good...

me too

this too... if I put out 4 books over 4 years (most likely more but not counting adventure and setting) and 1 only apeals to 50% of the players and 2 appeals to 80+% and 1 appeals to almost all the players from a game stand point it makes a much better more fun game to do that... from a money...

edition... or version all D&D and as such the same game. they are all D&D so the same game, 2e 3e and 3.5 are all different editions of the game (by any use we used prior to last year when wotc tried to redefine edition) Bo9S is a splat book optional add on to the 3.5 edition. again the game...

calling pervious editions a different game is WAY to dangerously close to calling them not D&D for me to agree.

nope... it is the weakest full caster in melee and it is doing a pretty good job with 1 of there cantrips and 0 spell slots... was not a bladesinger (or they would get a second attack at 1d8+5) and isn't useing any spells slots. there is 0 reason why a wizard should be able to do this, and...

right cause getting a shield prof is easy, and aagain anyone can get it... so no that didn't enter in, and at best gives the fighter a +2 AC but also the warcleric and I think hexblade and valor bard but I would have to check... if your argument is that shield prof is equal to having 3rd+ level...

I don't agree wth calling what we used to call editions of a game whole different games. This seems a way to split us even more then we already are

a GMforpowergamers 6e fighter looks like this: you have 3d10 as HD and you max 2 (20) and roll or take 6 for the third (with optional rules to roll all three or max all three or anywhere between) you pick a linage and a background and stats... but we are skipping all this for class. you...

I wont talk about everyone but I have seen plenty of people not line up 1 and 2 but agree on 3... so this seems odd

we can live in hope

I have the 4e books. I CAN in theory run a 4e game right now. I would mostly be intrested in fixin 4e issues and getting new players to buy in... so I would go with 2 Adv/disadv and concentration (but not just for spells) are both 5e things I would take. 2e HPs being WAY lower but front load...